The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of Xanomeline, a Selective Muscarinic Receptor Agonist, on Cognitive Function and Behavioral Symptoms in Alzheimer Disease
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the therapeutic effects of selective cholinergic replacement with xanomeline tartrate, an m1 and m4 selective muscarinic receptor (mAChR) agonist in patients with probable Alzheimer disease (AD). DESIGN: A 6-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial followed by a 1-month, single-blind, placebo washout. SETTING: Outpatients at 17 centers in the United States and Canada. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 343 men and women at least 60 years of age with mild to moderate AD. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received 75, 150, or 225 mg (low, medium, and high doses) of xanomeline per day or placebo for 6 months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores on the cognitive subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS-Cog), the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change (CIBIC+), the Alzheimer's Disease Symptomatology Scale (ADSS), and the Nurses' Observational Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER). RESULTS: A significant treatment effect existed for ADAS-Cog (high dose vs placebo; P < or = .05), and CIBIC+ (high dose vs placebo; P < or = .02). Treatment Emergent Signs and Symptoms analysis of the ADSS, which assesses behavioral symptoms in patients with AD, disclosed significant (P < or = .002) dose-dependent reductions in vocal outbursts, suspiciousness, delusions, agitation, and hallucinations. On end-point analysis, NOSGER, which assesses memory, instrumental activities of daily living, self-care, mood, social behavior, and disturbing behavior in the elderly, also showed a significant dose-response relationship (P < or = .02). In the high-dose arm, 52% of patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events; dose-dependent adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal in nature. Syncope, defined as loss of consciousness and muscle tone, occurred in 12.6% of patients in the high-dose group. CONCLUSIONS: The observed improvements in ADAS-Cog and CIBIC+ following treatment with xanomeline provide the first evidence, from a large-scale, placebo-controlled clinical trial, that a direct-acting muscarinic receptor agonist can improve cognitive function in patients with AD. Furthermore, the dramatic and favorable effects on disturbing behaviors in AD suggest a novel approach for treatment of noncognitive symptoms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 · Cited by 88,282
Alzheimer's Disease and Senile Dementia: Loss of Neurons in the Basal Forebrain
Whitehouse, P., Price, D., Struble, R., Clark, A., Coyle, J., & DeLong, M. R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7058341 · Cited by 3,627
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multicenter Study of Tacrine for Alzheimer's Disease
Davis, K. L., Thal, L. J., Gamzu, E. R., Davis, C. S., Woolson, R. F., Gracon, S. I., Drachman, D. A., Schneider, L. S., Whitehouse, P. J., Hoover, T. M., et al. (1992) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199210293271801 · Cited by 626
Eckols, K., Bymaster, F. P., Mitch, C. H., Shannon, H. E., Ward, J. S., & DeLapp, N. W. (1995) · Life Sciences · doi:10.1016/0024-3205(95)02064-p · Cited by 53
Self-citation
Cited by
Querfurth, H. W., & LaFerla, F. M. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0909142 · Cited by 4,569
The cholinergic hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: A review of progress
Francis, P. T., Palmer, A. M., Snape, M., & Wilcock, G. K. (1999) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.66.2.137 · Cited by 2,198
Alzheimer's disease: Targeting the Cholinergic System
H. Ferreira-Vieira, T., M. Guimaraes, I., R. Silva, F., & M. Ribeiro, F. (2016) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x13666150716165726 · Cited by 1,551
Miyamoto, S., Duncan, G. E., Marx, C. E., & Lieberman, J. A. (2005) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001556 · Cited by 988
Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition
Hasselmo, M. E., & Sarter, M. (2011) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/npp.2010.104 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Bodick, N. C., Offen, W. W., Levey, A. I., Cutler, N. R., Gauthier, S. G., Satlin, A., Shannon, H. E., Tollefson, G. D., Rasmussen, K., Bymaster, F. P., Hurley, D. J., Potter, W. Z., & Paul, S. M.
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 465-473
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067418199
- Cited by
- 692
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 27.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Xanomeline, a Selective Muscarinic Receptor Agonist, on Cognitive Function and Behavioral Symptoms in Alzheimer Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550160091022
- The paper
- Bodick, N. C., Offen, W. W., Levey, A. I., Cutler, N. R., Gauthier, S. G., Satlin, A., Shannon, H. E., Tollefson, G. D., Rasmussen, K., Bymaster, F. P., Hurley, D. J., Potter, W. Z., & Paul, S. M. (1997). Effects of Xanomeline, a Selective Muscarinic Receptor Agonist, on Cognitive Function and Behavioral Symptoms in Alzheimer Disease. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1997.00550160091022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.