Cited by 298Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchPsychological Testing and AssessmentHistorical and Modern Theater Studies

Variability in Annual Mini-Mental State Examination Score in Patients With Probable Alzheimer Disease: A Clinical Perspective of Data From the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease

Clark, Christopher M.·1999·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the variability in annual Mini-Mental State Examination scores of patients with Alzheimer disease enrolled in the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). PATIENTS: A total of 372 patients with probable Alzheimer disease with 1 or more years of follow-up. SETTING: Twenty-one CERAD clinical sites throughout the United States. RESULTS: An average annual decline of 3.4 points in CERAD patients returning for longitudinal reassessments was close to the SD of the measurement error of 2.8 points for the Mini-Mental State Examination. There was wide variability in individual rates of decline. Even with 4 years of follow-up, 15.8% of the patients had no clinically meaningful decline in Mini-Mental State Examination score (defined as a change in initial score >3, ie, 1 SD of measurement error). Validity of measurements of the rate of change in Mini-Mental State Examination scores improved with longer observation intervals and was reliable for most patients when observations were separated by 3 or more years. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Mini-Mental State Examination is a useful screening instrument to assess level of cognitive function, it has limited value in measuring the progression of Alzheimer disease in individual patients for periods less than 3 years because of a large measurement error and substantial variation in change in annual score.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.56.7.857

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 298

Authors
Clark, C. M.
Affiliations
University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Clark, Christopher M.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
1999-07-01
Volume
56
Issue
7
Pages
857
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2141838737
Cited by
298
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 14
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • National Institute on Aging (AG06790, U01AG006790, P30AG010124, AG-10124)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, Mini-Mental State Examination, cognitive decline, measurement error, interindividual variability, decline rate, longitudinal assessment, observation interval, cognitive screening
MeSH terms
Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Registries, Severity of Illness Index, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review