Cited by 171Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

Frequency of Tau Gene Mutations in Familial and Sporadic Cases of Non-Alzheimer Dementia

Poorkaj, Parvoneh, Grossman, Murray, Steinbart, Ellen, Payami, Haydeh, Sadovnick, Adele, Nochlin, David, Tabira, Takeshi, Trojanowski, John Q. +6 more·2001·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background Mutations in the tau gene have been reported in families with frontotemporal dementia (FTD) linked to chromosome 17. It remains uncertain how commonly such mutations are found in patients with FTD or non-Alzheimer dementia with or without a positive family history. Objective To determine the frequency of tau mutations in patients with non-Alzheimer dementia. Patients and methods One hundred one patients with non-Alzheimer, nonvascular dementia, most thought to have FTD. Of these, 57 had a positive family history of dementia. Neuropathologic findings were available in 32. The tau gene was sequenced for all exons including flanking intronic DNA, portions of the 3' and 5' untranslated regions, and at least 146 base pairs in the intron following exon 10. Results Overall, the frequency of the tau mutations was low, being 5.9% (6/101) in the entire group. No mutations were found in the 44 sporadic cases. However, 6 (10.5%) of the 57 familial cases and 4 (33%) of the 12 familial cases with tau pathologic findings had mutations in the tau gene. The most common mutation was P301L. Conclusions We conclude that tau mutations are uncommon in a neurology referral population with non-Alzheimer dementia, even in those with a clinical diagnosis of FTD. However, a positive family history and/or tau pathologic findings increase the likelihood of a tau mutation. There must be other genetic and nongenetic causes of FTD and non-Alzheimer dementia, similar to the etiologic heterogeneity…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.58.3.383

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poorkaj, P., Grossman, M., Steinbart, E., Payami, H., Sadovnick, A., Nochlin, D., Tabira, T., Trojanowski, J. Q., Borson, S., Galasko, D., Reich, S., Quinn, B., Schellenberg, G., & Bird, T. D.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Bird, Thomas D.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2001-03-01
Volume
58
Issue
3
Pages
383-7
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972553694
Cited by
171
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (AG 05136, P30AG010124, P01AG017586, AG17586, AG-10124, P50AG005136)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
tau gene mutations, frontotemporal dementia, non-Alzheimer's dementia, familial dementia, P301L mutation, family history (medicine), tau pathology, genetic etiology, mutation frequency
MeSH terms
Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17, Dementia, Family Health, Humans, tau Proteins, Point Mutation, DNA Primers, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review