Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 177

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying the Pattern of Olfactory Deficits in Parkinson Disease Using the Brief Smell Identification Test

Double, Kay L., Rowe, Dominic B., Hayes, Michael, Chan, Daniel K. Y., Blackie, Jeff, Corbett, Alastair, Joffe, Ronald, Fung, Victor S., Morris, John, Halliday, Glenda M.·2003·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Selective olfactory deficits occur in 70% to 90% of patients with Parkinson disease, independent of disease severity and duration. Olfactory testing may be a useful diagnostic aid for Parkinson disease, but the types of odors most commonly affected need to be identified. OBJECTIVE: To determine the pattern and types of odors affected in Parkinson disease by means of the University of Pennsylvania 12-item Brief Smell Identification Test (B-SIT; Sensonics, Inc, Haddon Heights, NJ). DESIGN: Testing patients with Parkinson disease and control subjects in 5 movement disorder clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-nine nondemented patients with Parkinson disease and 52 age- and sex-matched controls. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normal or abnormal olfactory function was determined in each subject according to predetermined age and sex norms. Predictive statistics and discriminant function analyses were performed to determine the pattern and types of odors best discriminating patients from controls. RESULTS: Abnormal olfactory function was present in 40 (82%) of patients compared with 12 (23%) of controls. The B-SIT score was unaffected by smoking behavior, disease duration, or severity. The sensitivity of the B-SIT for Parkinson disease was 0.82, with a specificity and predictive value of 0.82 and 0.77, respectively. Only 5 of the 12 B-SIT odors (gasoline, banana, pineapple, smoke, and cinnamon) were required to adequately discriminate patients with Parkinson disease from controls. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of the B-SIT, 5 specific odors appear primarily affected in patients with Parkinson disease. Significantly, the ability of patients to detect some odors was unimpaired compared with that of controls. Better diagnostic aids could be developed on the basis of the selective pattern of hyposmia observed in Parkinson disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.60.4.545

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 177

Metadata

Authors
Double, K. L., Rowe, D. B., Hayes, M., Chan, D. K. Y., Blackie, J., Corbett, A., Joffe, R., Fung, V. S., Morris, J., & Halliday, G. M.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2003-04-01
Volume
60
Issue
4
Pages
545
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2010998231
Cited by
177
References
2
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying the Pattern of Olfactory Deficits in Parkinson Disease Using the Brief Smell Identification Test. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.60.4.545
The paper
Double, K. L., Rowe, D. B., Hayes, M., Chan, D. K. Y., Blackie, J., Corbett, A., Joffe, R., Fung, V. S., Morris, J., & Halliday, G. M. (2003). Identifying the Pattern of Olfactory Deficits in Parkinson Disease Using the Brief Smell Identification Test. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.60.4.545

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.