The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Rasagiline in Levodopa-Treated Patients With Parkinson Disease and Motor Fluctuations: The PRESTO Study
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Rasagiline (n-propargyl-1[R]-aminoindan) mesylate is a novel irreversible selective monoamine oxidase type B inhibitor, previously demonstrated to improve symptoms in early Parkinson disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of rasagiline in levodopa-treated patients with PD and motor fluctuations. DESIGN: Multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. PATIENTS: Parkinson disease patients (N = 472) with at least 21/2 hours of daily "off" (poor motor function) time, despite optimized treatment with other anti-PD medications. INTERVENTIONS: Rasagiline, 1.0 or 0.5 mg/d, or matching placebo. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change from baseline in total daily off time measured by patients' home diaries during 26 weeks of treatment, percentage of patients completing 26 weeks of treatment, and adverse event frequency. RESULTS: During the treatment period, the mean adjusted total daily off time decreased from baseline by 1.85 hours (29%) in patients treated with 1.0 mg/d of rasagiline, 1.41 hours (23%) with 0.5 mg/d rasagiline, and 0.91 hour (15%) with placebo. Compared with placebo, patients treated with 1.0 mg/d rasagiline had 0.94 hour less off time per day, and patients treated with 0.5 mg/d rasagiline had 0.49 hour less off time per day. Prespecified secondary end points also improved during rasagiline treatment, including scores on an investigator-rated clinical global impression scale and the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (activities of daily living in the off state and motor performance in the "on" state). Rasagiline was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Rasagiline improves motor fluctuations and PD symptoms in levodopa-treated PD patients. In light of recently reported benefits in patients with early illness, rasagiline is a promising new treatment for PD.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The therapeutic potential of monoamine oxidase inhibitors
Youdim, M. B. H., Edmondson, D., & Tipton, K. F. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1883 · Cited by 1,363
The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease (2009)
Olanow, C. W., Stern, M. B., & Sethi, K. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181a1d44c · Cited by 908
Fox, S. H., Katzenschlager, R., Lim, S., Ravina, B., Seppi, K., Coelho, M., Poewe, W., Rascol, O., Goetz, C. G., & Sampaio, C. (2011) · Movement Disorders · doi:10.1002/mds.23829 · Cited by 523
Poewe, W. H., Rascol, O., Quinn, N., Tolosa, E., Oertel, W. H., Martignoni, E., Rupp, M., & Boroojerdi, B. (2007) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(07)70108-4 · Cited by 398
Epidemiological, clinical, and genetic characteristics of early-onset parkinsonism
Schrag, A., & Schott, J. M. (2006) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(06)70411-2 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2005-02-01
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 241
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4245200085
- Cited by
- 418
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Rasagiline in Levodopa-Treated Patients With Parkinson Disease and Motor Fluctuations: The PRESTO Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.2.241
- The paper
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Rasagiline in Levodopa-Treated Patients With Parkinson Disease and Motor Fluctuations: The PRESTO Study. (2005). Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.2.241
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.