Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 370

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictors and Impact of Aneurysm Rebleeding After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Naidech, Andrew M., Janjua, Nazli, Kreiter, Kurt T., Ostapkovich, Noeleen D., Fitzsimmons, Brian-Fred, Parra, Augusto, Commichau, Christopher, Connolly, E. Sander, Mayer, Stephan A.·2005·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Aneurysm rebleeding has historically been an important cause of mortality after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency and impact of rebleeding in the modern era of aneurysm care, which emphasizes early surgical or endovascular treatment. DESIGN: Inception cohort. SETTING: Tertiary care medical center. PATIENTS: A total of 574 patients enrolled in the Columbia University SAH Outcomes Project between August 1996 and June 2002. Early aneurysm repair was performed whenever feasible. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rebleeding was defined by prespecified clinical and radiographic criteria, excluding prehospital, intraprocedural, and postrepair events. Functional outcome was assessed at 3 months with the modified Rankin Scale. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of rebleeding, poor functional outcome, and mortality. RESULTS: Rebleeding occurred in 40 (6.9%) of the 574 patients; most cases (73%) occurred within 3 days of ictus. Hunt-Hess grade on admission (odds ratio [OR], 1.92 per grade; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-2.75; P<.001) and maximal aneurysm diameter (OR, 1.07/mm; 95% CI, 1.01-1.13; P = .005) were independent predictors of rebleeding. After controlling for Hunt-Hess grade and aneurysm size, rebleeding was associated with a markedly reduced chance of survival with functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, </=4; OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.34) at 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Despite an aggressive management strategy, rebleeding still occurred in 6.9% of patients and was associated with a dismal outcome. Poor Hunt-Hess grade and larger aneurysm size are related to rebleeding. Pharmacologic therapy to reduce the risk of rebleeding before aneurysm repair, particularly in patients with poor grade neurologic status and large aneurysms, deserves renewed attention.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.62.3.410

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 370

Metadata

Authors
Naidech, A. M., Janjua, N., Kreiter, K. T., Ostapkovich, N. D., Fitzsimmons, B.-F., Parra, A., Commichau, C., Connolly, E. S., & Mayer, S. A.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2005-03-01
Volume
62
Issue
3
Pages
410
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1990316520
Cited by
370
References
15
FWCI
8.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictors and Impact of Aneurysm Rebleeding After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.62.3.410
The paper
Naidech, A. M., Janjua, N., Kreiter, K. T., Ostapkovich, N. D., Fitzsimmons, B.-F., Parra, A., Commichau, C., Connolly, E. S., & Mayer, S. A. (2005). Predictors and Impact of Aneurysm Rebleeding After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.62.3.410

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.