Cited by 337Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological disorders and treatments

Patterns of Brain Atrophy That Differentiate Corticobasal Degeneration Syndrome From Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Boxer, Adam L., Geschwind, Michael D., Belfor, Nataliya, Gorno-Tempini, Maria Luisa, Schauer, Guido F., Miller, Bruce L., Weiner, Michael W., Rosen, Howard J.·2006·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background Progressive brain atrophy is associated with the corticobasal degeneration syndrome (CBDS) and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Regional differences in brain atrophy may reflect the clinical features of disease. Objective To quantify the structural neuroanatomical differences between CBDS and PSP. Design A survey of neurologic deficits was conducted in all patients. Voxel-based morphometry was used to quantify structural neuroanatomical differences on magnetic resonance images in each subject group. Setting University hospital dementia clinic. Participants Fourteen patients who met clinical research criteria for CBD and 15 patients who met clinical research criteria for PSP, who were matched for severity of disease, age, and functional status, and 80 age-matched control subjects. Main outcome measures Statistically significant differences in regional gray and white matter volume, after multiple comparisons correction, between groups of subjects. Results The patients with CBDS displayed an asymmetric (left > right) pattern of brain atrophy that involved the bilateral premotor cortex, superior parietal lobules, and striatum. Progressive supranuclear palsy was associated with atrophy of the midbrain, pons, thalamus, and striatum, with minimal involvement of the frontal cortex. Midbrain structures were more atrophied in PSP than in CBD, whereas dorsal frontal and parietal cortices were more atrophied in CBD than in PSP. The degree of atrophy of the midbrain and po…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.63.1.81

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 337

Authors
Boxer, A. L., Geschwind, M. D., Belfor, N., Gorno-Tempini, M. L., Schauer, G. F., Miller, B. L., Weiner, M. W., & Rosen, H. J.
Affiliations
University of California, San Francisco (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2006-01-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
81
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2084691579
Cited by
337
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG-19724, P01AG019724)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (K23NS48855, K23NS048855)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
Keywords
progressive supranuclear palsy, brain atrophy patterns, differential diagnosis, midbrain atrophy, pontine tegmentum, frontal eye field, premotor cortex, superior parietal lobule, striatum, thalamus, gray and white matter volume, oculomotor control
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrophy, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Demography, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Nerve Degeneration, Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive, Case-Control Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review