Cited by 304Neurological disorders and treatmentsParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNeurological and metabolic disorders

Common Misdiagnosis of a Common Neurological Disorder: How Are We Misdiagnosing Essential Tremor?

Jain, Samay, Lo, Steven E., Louis, Elan D.·2006·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: As a common neurological disorder, the diagnosis of essential tremor (ET) is considered routine. Despite this, previous work suggests that misdiagnoses may be common. Among other things, these misdiagnoses can lead to treatment errors. OBJECTIVES: To estimate how often other tremor disorders are misdiagnosed as ET and to identify factors that increase the odds of misdiagnosing ET and to precisely quantify the extent to which they do so. DESIGN: Seventy-one consecutive patients underwent an evaluation at the Neurological Institute of New York, New York, between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2005; these patients had a pre-evaluation diagnosis of ET. The criteria for ET were adapted from the consensus statement of the Movement Disorder Society. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (37%) were misdiagnosed as having ET ("false ET"). Their true diagnoses were Parkinson disease (11 patients [15%]), dystonia (6 patients [8%]), Parkinson disease with ET (5 patients [7%]), and other disorders (4 patients [6%]). Factors associated with misdiagnosed ET included unilateral arm tremor (odds ratio, 10.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-95.4; P=.02), spooning of the hands and other dystonic postures (odds ratio, 16.3; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-66.4; P<.001), and other unusual features (isolated thumb tremor, isolated leg tremor, and non-rhythmic tremor) (odds ratio, 49.4; 95% confidence interval, 2.7-895.0; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: About 1 in 3 patients with tremor was misdiagnosed as having ET, with the most frequent false diagnoses being Parkinson disease and dystonia. Several factors that increased the odds of misdiagnosing ET were identified. These factors could be incorporated into improved diagnostic algorithms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.63.8.1100

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jain, S., Lo, S. E., & Louis, E. D.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2006-08-01
Volume
63
Issue
8
Pages
1100
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2135267022
Cited by
304
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 13
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Neurological and metabolic disorders
Keywords
essential tremor, misdiagnosis, tremor disorders, Parkinson's disease, dystonia, diagnostic criteria, dystonic posture, diagnostic algorithm
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Diagnosis, Differential, Diagnostic Errors, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Retrospective Studies, Essential Tremor, Dystonic Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review