Cited by 126

Differentiation Between Primary Lateral Sclerosis and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: Examination of Symptoms and Signs at Disease Onset and During Follow-up

Tartaglia, Maria Carmela, Rowe, Ann, Findlater, Karen, Orange, J. B., Grace, Gloria, Strong, Michael J.·2007·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background Motor neuron diseases can affect the upper motor neuron and/or the lower motor neuron. Both amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) are motor neuron diseases, and there is much debate as to whether these are 2 separate disorders or simply 2 points on a continuum. Objective To determine which clinical features at onset and during follow-up could help differentiate between PLS and ALS. Design Retrospective study comparing patients with a diagnosis of PLS or ALS for differences in symptoms or signs at disease onset and during follow-up. Setting Tertiary referral center. Patients Six hundred sixty-one patients with ALS and 43 patients with PLS were included in the study. Results At presentation, stiffness was the only symptom that was significantly different between patients with PLS and patients with ALS (observed in 47% and 4% of patients, respectively; P Conclusion Our findings suggest that a patient presenting with spasticity who does not develop wasting within 3 years most likely has PLS.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.64.2.232

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The analysis dataset included PMA patients but excluded PLS patients.

    “our analysis dataset included PMA patients, who typically experience a similarly progressive disease course (n=37 with interviews; n=66 with DNA samples), while PLS patients, who typically progress much more slowly (41), were excluded.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tartaglia, M. C., Rowe, A., Findlater, K., Orange, J. B., Grace, G., & Strong, M. J.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2007-02-01
Volume
64
Issue
2
Pages
232
ISSN
0003-9942
Cited by
126
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review