Cited by 0Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Dissociation of Neuropathologic Findings and Cognition: Case Report of an Apolipoprotein E ε2/ε2 Genotype

Berlau, Daniel J., Kahle-Wrobleski, Kristin, Head, Elizabeth, Goodus, Matthew, Kim, Ronald, Kawas, Claudia·2007·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background The apolipoprotein E (APOE) epsilon2 allele has been suggested as having a protective effect and delaying the age at onset of Alzheimer disease.Objective To describe a dissociation between neuropathologic findings with normal cognition in a woman with severe Alzheimer disease with the APOE epsilon2/epsilon2 genotype.Design Case report from a community-based prospective study of persons 90 years or older (The 90+ Study).Participant A 92-year-old woman without dementia with the APOE epsilon2/epsilon2 genotype who lived independently without significant cognitive or functional loss and was a participant in The 90+ Study. She died in December 2004, and postmortem examination of her brain was performed.Intervention Neurologic examination and a battery of neuropsychological tests were performed 6 months and 1 month before death. Neuropathologic examination included Braak and Braak staging for senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles.Results Neuropathologic examination of the brain revealed advanced senile plaque and neurofibrillary tangle disease consistent with a high likelihood of Alzheimer disease. At clinical evaluation, the participant demonstrated no dementia and only mild cognitive deficits.Conclusions The APOE genotype may have contributed to maintenance of cognition despite advanced neuropathologic findings of Alzheimer disease. This case suggests that the APOE epsilon2 isoform may have a protective effect against cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease that may be independent from senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneur.64.8.1193

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • APOE2-induced deposition of diffuse plaques is novel in a mouse model and consistent with previous work by Dr. C. Kawas and co-workers.

    “This APOE2induced deposition of diffuse plaques is novel in a mouse model and consistent with the previous work by Dr. C. Kawas and co-workers (54,55) who report that increased diffuse plaques are associated with APOE2 in cognitively normal subjects compared with compact plaques in APOE4 AD patients from the oldest of the old study.”
  • The single case report outlier, a Braak neuropathologic stage VI case without full-blown dementia, had some degree of cognitive impairment within expectations for late preclinical Alzheimer disease.

    “Even the single case report “outlier,” a Braak neuropathologic stage VI case without full-blown dementia, had some degree of cognitive impairment within expectations for late preclinical AD (306).”
  • Some cases classified as 'high level' of AD neuropathological changes may show subtle or undetectable cognitive impairment.

    “Some cases classified as “high level” of AD neuropathological changes may show subtle or undetectable cognitive impairment, yet all cases with quantifiably “end stage” neocortical NFT pathology show cognitive impairment (Dickson et al., 1995; Berlau et al., 2007; Nelson et al., 2009a, 2012; Abner et al., 2011; Santacruz et al., 2011; Jicha et al., 2012).”
  • All cases with quantifiably 'end stage' neocortical NFT pathology show cognitive impairment.

    “Some cases classified as “high level” of AD neuropathological changes may show subtle or undetectable cognitive impairment, yet all cases with quantifiably “end stage” neocortical NFT pathology show cognitive impairment (Dickson et al., 1995; Berlau et al., 2007; Nelson et al., 2009a, 2012; Abner et al., 2011; Santacruz et al., 2011; Jicha et al., 2012).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 21

Authors
Berlau, D. J., Kahle-Wrobleski, K., Head, E., Goodus, M., Kim, R., & Kawas, C.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2007-08-01
Volume
64
Issue
8
Pages
1193
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1542516994
Cited by
0
References
21
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01 AG21055, R01AG021055)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
cognitive impairment, dissociation, neuropathology, dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review