The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple Sclerosis Risk After Optic Neuritis: Final Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial Follow-up
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS) after optic neuritis and the factors predictive of high and low risk. DESIGN: Subjects in the Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial, who were enrolled between July 1, 1988, and June 30, 1991, were followed up prospectively for 15 years, with the final examination in 2006. SETTING: Neurologic and ophthalmologic examinations at 13 clinical sites. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred eighty-nine subjects with acute optic neuritis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Development of MS and neurologic disability assessment. RESULTS: The cumulative probability of developing MS by 15 years after onset of optic neuritis was 50% (95% confidence interval, 44%-56%) and strongly related to presence of lesions on a baseline non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain. Twenty-five percent of patients with no lesions on baseline brain MRI developed MS during follow-up compared with 72% of patients with 1 or more lesions. After 10 years, the risk of developing MS was very low for patients without baseline lesions but remained substantial for those with lesions. Among patients without lesions on MRI, baseline factors associated with a substantially lower risk for MS included male sex, optic disc swelling, and certain atypical features of optic neuritis. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of brain MRI abnormalities at the time of an optic neuritis attack is a strong predictor of the 15-year risk of MS. In the absence of MRI-detected lesions, male sex, optic disc swelling, and atypical clinical features of optic neuritis are associated with a low likelihood of developing MS. This natural history information is important when considering prophylactic treatment for MS at the time of a first acute onset of optic neuritis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A longitudinal study of abnormalities on MRI and disability from multiple sclerosis
Brex, P. A., Ciccarelli, O., O'Riordan, J. I., Sailer, M., Thompson, A. J., & Miller, D. H. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa011341 · Cited by 861
Cited by
Defining high, medium, and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis
Tintore, M., Rovira, À., Río, J., Otero-Romero, S., Arrambide, G., Tur, C., Comabella, M., Nos, C., Arévalo, M. J., Negrotto, L., et al. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv105 · Cited by 530
Miller, D. H., Chard, D. T., & Ciccarelli, O. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70274-5 · Cited by 507
Chen, J. J., Flanagan, E. P., Jitprapaikulsan, J., López-Chiriboga, A. (. S., Fryer, J. P., Leavitt, J. A., Weinshenker, B. G., McKeon, A., Tillema, J.-M., Lennon, V. A., et al. (2018) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2018.07.020 · Cited by 408
Clinical Course of Multiple Sclerosis
Klineova, S., & Lublin, F. D. (2018) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a028928 · Cited by 401
Traboulsee, A., Simon, J. H., Stone, L., Fisher, E., Jones, D. E., Malhotra, A., Newsome, S. D., Oh, J., Reich, D. S., Richert, N., et al. (2016) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a4539 · Cited by 340
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Neurology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-06-01
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 727-32
- ISSN
- 0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2593349093
- Cited by
- 476
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple Sclerosis Risk After Optic Neuritis: Final Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial Follow-up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archneur.65.6.727
- The paper
- Multiple Sclerosis Risk After Optic Neuritis: Final Optic Neuritis Treatment Trial Follow-up. (2008). Archives of Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.65.6.727
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.