Cited by 3Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesClinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills

Association Between Clinical Conversion to Multiple Sclerosis in Radiologically Isolated Syndrome and Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cerebrospinal Fluid, and Visual Evoked Potential: Follow-up of 70 Patients

Lebrun, Christine·2009·Archives of Neurology

Abstract

Background Subclinical demyelinating lesions may occur in the brains of asymptomatic individuals. Objective To describe the clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) follow-up of patients with subclinical demyelinating lesions that fulfill the Barkhof/Tintoré criteria. Design Prospective study. Setting University-affiliated teaching hospitals. Patients Fifty-three women and 17 men with subclinical demyelinating lesions (mean age, 35.63 years). Main outcome measures Cerebrospinal fluid, MRI, and visual evoked potential measurements. Methods All patients underwent their first brain MRI for various medical problems that were not suggestive of multiple sclerosis (MS). The patients' physicians proposed that they undergo paraclinical studies (blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and visual evoked potential analysis) and follow-up with MRI. Results Twenty-three patients (33%) had clinical conversion: 6 to optic neuritis, 6 to myelitis, 5 to brainstem symptoms, 4 to sensitive symptoms, 1 to cerebellar symptoms, and 1 to cognitive deterioration. The mean time between the first brain MRI and the first clinically isolated syndrome was 2.3 years (range, 0.8-5.0 years). Twelve patients had been treated with immunomodulators after a clinically isolated syndrome. Examination of pejorative markers for clinical conversion showed that sex, number of T2 lesions, presence of oligoclonal bands, and IgG index were not statistically different in patients with MS determined by MRI compared with clinicall…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archneurol.2009.119

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Younger age, male gender and gadolinium-enhancing, cortical or spinal cord lesions may be associated with an increased risk of developing MS in RIS patients.

    “Younger age, male gender and gadolinium-enhancing, cortical or spinal cord lesions may be associated with an increased risk of developing MS.29- 31”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lebrun, C.
Venue
Archives of Neurology
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
66
Issue
7
Pages
841
ISSN
0003-9942 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1488216947
Cited by
0
References
2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives of Neurology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Keywords
radiologically isolated syndrome, multiple sclerosis, magnetic resonance imaging, cerebrospinal fluid, visual evoked potentials, disease progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review