Cited by 184Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsIntraocular Surgery and LensesRetinal and Macular Surgery

The relationship of ocular factors to the incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy

Klein, Ronald·1998·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between ocular factors and the incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy. PARTICIPANTS: A population of 3684 adults (43-86 years of age at baseline) living in Beaver Dam, Wis, studied at baseline and 5 years later. METHODS: Standardized protocols for refraction and determination of iris color, administration of a questionnaire, and slitlamp and retroillumination photographs of the lenses to determine cataract type and stereoscopic color fundus photographs to determine presence and severity of age-related maculopathy. Standard univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy. RESULTS: After controlling for age, eyes that had undergone cataract surgery before baseline were more likely to have progression of age-related maculopathy (odds ratio, 2.71; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-4.35) and to develop signs of late age-related maculopathy (odds ratio, 2.80; 95% CI, 1.03-7.63) than were eyes that were phakic at baseline. These relationships remained after controlling for other risk factors in multivariate analyses. There was no relationship of nuclear cataract, cortical cataract, or iris color to the incidence and progression of age-related maculopathy. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate a relationship between cataract surgery and increased risk of progression of age-related maculopathy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.116.4.506

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blue iris colour has been inconsistently implicated as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration and has been considered a possible marker for pigment content in the retinal pigment epithelium.

    “Blue iris colour has been inconsistently implicated as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration and has been considered a possible marker for pigment content in the retinal pigment epithelium.109,110”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [110]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 46 · Cited by 184

Authors
Klein, R.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Ronald
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1998-04-01
Volume
116
Issue
4
Pages
506
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109108576
Cited by
184
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
  • Research to Prevent Blindness
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison
  • National Institutes of Health (EYO6594)
  • National Eye Institute (EY O6594, U10EY006594)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
age-related maculopathy, cataract surgery, cataract types, nuclear cataract, cortical cataract, iris color, lens opacity, disease progression, incidence
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cataract, Cataract Extraction, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Visual Acuity, Wisconsin, Incidence, Prevalence, Disease Progression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review