Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 361

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Choriocapillaris Degeneration and Related Pathologic Changes in Human Diabetic Eyes

Cao, Jingtai·1998·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To measure the extent of choriocapillaris degeneration (CCD) in diabetic choroids and to study the association of CCD with choroidal neovascularization and pathologic changes in Bruch's membrane-like basal laminar deposits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human choroids from 10 postmortem subjects (diabetic, 5 [group 1]; nondiabetic, 5 [group 2]) were incubated for the histochemical demonstration of alkaline phosphatase and nonspecific esterase activities, permitting analysis of the choroidal vasculature and polymorphonuclear leukocytes, respectively. The tissue was then flat embedded and sectioned for structural analysis. Areas of CCD were measured in the flat perspective by computer-assisted image analysis and verified in cross-sections of flat-embedded tissue. RESULTS: The CCD in choroids from subjects with diabetes (group 1) appeared in 2 patterns: diffuse (partial loss of alkaline phosphatase activity in a poorly defined area, ie, degeneration of some capillary segments) and focal (complete degeneration of choriocapillaris or loss of alkaline phosphatase activity in a relatively well-defined area). The mean+/-SD percentage of the choroid with focal CCD in group 1 was 5.08%+/-1.13% of the total choroidal area vs 1. 16%+/-0.35% in group 2 (P<.001). Focal CCD in group 1 was more prominent in the posterior pole than in the peripheral choroid. Choroidal neovascularization was associated with some areas of diffuse CCD in group 1. Pathologic changes in Bruch's membrane-like basal laminar deposits were often associated with CCD; the thickness of the deposits was greater in group 1 than in group 2 and greater in areas with focal CCD than in areas with diffuse or no CCD. CONCLUSION: The percentage of choroid with focal CCD in group 1 choroids was more than 4-fold greater than that in nondiabetic choroids. The presence of CCD was related to basal laminar deposits and, in some cases, to choroidal neovascularization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.116.5.589

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 361

Metadata

Authors
Cao, J.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1998-05-01
Volume
116
Issue
5
Pages
589
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2170973199
Cited by
361
References
18
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Choriocapillaris Degeneration and Related Pathologic Changes in Human Diabetic Eyes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.116.5.589
The paper
Cao, J. (1998). Choriocapillaris Degeneration and Related Pathologic Changes in Human Diabetic Eyes. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.116.5.589

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.