The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Ocular Hypertensive, Normal, and Glaucomatous Eyes With Optical Coherence Tomography
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantitatively assess and compare the thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) in ocular hypertensive eyes with normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Optical Coherence Tomograph (OCT 2000, software version A4X1; Humphrey Instruments, San Leandro, Calif). METHODS: The mean RNFL thickness of ocular hypertensive (n = 28) eyes was compared with age-matched normal (n = 30) and glaucomatous (n = 29) eyes. Subject eyes were classified into diagnostic groups based on intraocular pressure, stereoscopic disc photographs, and standard automated perimetry. Three circular scans were obtained for each eye at a diameter of 3.4 mm around the optic disc. In each eye, average RNFL thickness measurements were obtained in temporal, superior, nasal, and inferior quadrants. A single index of average RNFL thickness throughout 360 degrees also was obtained. RESULTS: Mean (95% confidence interval) RNFL was significantly thinner in ocular hypertensive eyes than in normal eyes, 72.8 microm (66.4-78.1 microm) and 85.8 microm (80.2-91.7 microm), respectively. More specifically, RNFL was significantly thinner in ocular hypertensive eyes than in normal eyes in the inferior quadrant, 84.8 microm (75.6-94.0 microm) vs 107.6 microm (99.3-115.9 microm); and in the nasal quadrant, 44.1 microm (37.5-51.7 microm) vs 61.8 microm (53.0-65.6 microm). Retinal nerve fiber layer was significantly thinner in glaucomatous eyes than in ocular hypertensive and normal eyes throughout 360 degrees and in all quadrants. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that quantitative differences in RNFL thickness exist between age-matched ocular hypertensive, normal, and glaucomatous eyes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ultrahigh-resolution ophthalmic optical coherence tomography
Drexler, W., Morgner, U., Ghanta, R. K., Kärtner, F. X., Schuman, J. S., & Fujimoto, J. G. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/86589 · Cited by 962
Medeiros, F. A., Zangwill, L. M., Bowd, C., Vessani, R. M., Susanna, R., & Weinreb, R. N. (2005) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2004.08.069 · Cited by 649
Self-citationFactors Influencing Optic Nerve Head Biomechanics
Sigal, I. A., Flanagan, J. G., & Ethier, C. R. (2005) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.05-0541 · Cited by 507
Jansonius, N. M., Nevalainen, J., Selig, B., Zangwill, L. M., Sample, P. A., Budde, W. M., Jonas, J. B., Lagrèze, W. A., Airaksinen, P. J., Vonthein, R., et al. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.029 · Cited by 155
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowd, C.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-01-01
- Volume
- 118
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2001966277
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 14.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Ocular Hypertensive, Normal, and Glaucomatous Eyes With Optical Coherence Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.118.1.22
- The paper
- Bowd, C. (2000). The Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Thickness in Ocular Hypertensive, Normal, and Glaucomatous Eyes With Optical Coherence Tomography. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.118.1.22
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.