Risk Factors for Age-Related Maculopathy: The Visual Impairment Project
Open accessAbstract
Objective To describe the risk factors and associated population attributable risk for age-related maculopathy (ARM) and age-related macular degeneration(AMD) in Australians aged 40 years and older. Methods Residents were recruited from 9 randomly selected urban clusters and 4 randomly selected rural clusters in Victoria, Australia. At locally established test sites, the following information was collected: visual acuity, medical and health history, lifetime sunlight exposure, dietary intake, and fundus photographs. Age-related maculopathy and AMD were graded from the fundus photographs using an international classification and grading system. Backwards logistic regression was used to identify the independent risk factors for ARM and AMD. Results The participation rate was 83% (n = 3271) among the urban residents and 92% (n = 1473) among the rural residents. Gradable fundus photographs of either eye were available for 4345 (92%) of the 4744 participants. There were 656 cases of ARM, giving a weighted prevalence of 15.1% (95% confidence limit [CL], 13.8, 16.4); and there were 30 cases of AMD, giving a weighted prevalence of 0.69% (95% CL, 0.33, 1.03). In multiple logistic regression, the risk factors for AMD were as follows: age (odds ratio [OR], 1.23; 95% CL, 1.17, 1.29), smoked cigarettes for longer than 40 years (OR, 2.39; 95% CL, 1.02, 5.57), and ever taken angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (OR, 3.26; 95% CL, 1.33, 8.01). The magnitude of all of these risk factors was slightly less for ARM, and having ever taken blood cholesterol–lowering medications was also significant (OR, 1.67; 95% CL, 1.12, 2.47;P= .001). Conclusion Smoking is the only modifiable risk factor for ARM and AMD, among the many environmental and systemic factors that were assessed.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Age is the strongest risk factor associated with the development of AMD.
“Age is the strongest risk factor associated with the development of AMD (3, 112, 140) (Figure 3).”
From Unraveling a Multifactorial Late-Onset Disease: From Genetic Susceptibility to Disease Mechanisms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2009) · cites this paper as [112]
Smoking is a modifiable and consistently associated environmental factor, typically resulting in about two-fold increased risk of developing advanced AMD.
“Smoking is a modifiable and consistently associated environmental factor, typically resulting in about two-fold increased risk of developing advanced AMD (3, 112, 150, 155).”
From Unraveling a Multifactorial Late-Onset Disease: From Genetic Susceptibility to Disease Mechanisms for Age-Related Macular Degeneration (2009) · cites this paper as [112]
Cigarette smoking is a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration, confirmed by case-control, population-based, and prospective studies.
“Results from a number of case-control studies,28–33 population-based studies,34–36 and prospective studies of both physicians37 and nurses38 strongly confirm cigarette smoking as a risk factor for age-related macular degeneration.”
From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 65 · Cited by 12
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Delcourt C, Diaz JL, Ponton-Sanchez A, Papoz L. Smoking and age-related macu- lar degeration: the POLA Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116:1031-1035.
- Eye Disease Case-Control Study Group. Antioxidant status and neovascular age- related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:104-109.
- Mitchell P, Chapman S, Smith W. "Smoking is a major cause of blindness" [edi- torial]. Med J Aust. 1999;171:173-174.
- Duncan DD, Mun ˜oz B, Bandeen-Roche K, West SK. Visible and ultraviolet-B ocular- ambient exposure ratios for a general population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1997; 38:1003-1011.
- Smith W, Mitchell P, Leeder SR, Wang JJ. Plasma fibrinogen levels, other car- diovascular risk factors, and age-related maculopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998; 116:583-588.
- The Age-Related Eye Disease Study Research Group. The Age-Related Eye Dis- ease Study (AREDS): design implications: AREDS report No. 1. Control Clin Tri- als. 1999;20:573-600.
- Authors
- McCarty, C. A.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Corresponding author
- McCarty, Catherine A.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2001-10-01
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1455
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W316857543
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
- Keywords
- age-related maculopathy, age-related macular degeneration, risk factors, smoking, ACE inhibitors, cholesterol-lowering drugs, sun exposure, dietary intake, modifiable risk factors, population attributable risk, prevalence, fundus images, older adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review