The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Refractive Error and Ethnicity in Children
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report the baseline prevalence of refractive error in the study population. DESIGN: A multicenter, longitudinal, observational study of refractive error and ocular development in children from 4 ethnic groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study population included 2523 children (534 African American, 491 Asian, 463 Hispanic, and 1035 white) in grades 1 to 8 (age, 5-17 years). Myopia was defined as -0.75 diopters (D) or more and hyperopia as +1.25 D or more in each principal meridian, and astigmatism was defined as at least a 1.00-D difference between the 2 principal meridians (cycloplegic autorefraction). RESULTS: Overall, 9.2% of the children were myopic, 12.8% were hyperopic, and 28.4% were astigmatic. There were significant differences in the refractive error prevalences as a function of ethnicity (chi2, P<.001), even after controlling for age and sex (polychotomous logistic regression, P<.001). For myopia, Asians had the highest prevalence (18.5%), followed by Hispanics (13.2%). Whites had the lowest prevalence of myopia (4.4%), which was not significantly different from African Americans (6.6%). For hyperopia, whites had the highest prevalence (19.3%), followed by Hispanics (12.7%). Asians had the lowest prevalence of hyperopia (6.3%) and were not significantly different from African Americans (6.4%). For astigmatism, Asians and Hispanics had the highest prevalences (33.6% and 36.9%, respectively) and did not differ from each other (P =.17). African Americans had the lowest prevalence of astigmatism (20.0%), followed by whites (26.4%). CONCLUSION: There were significant differences in the prevalence of refractive errors among ethnic groups, even after controlling for age and sex (P<.001).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Outdoor Activity during Class Recess Reduces Myopia Onset and Progression in School Children
Wu, P.-C., Tsai, C.-L., Wu, H.-L., Yang, Y.-H., & Kuo, H.-K. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.009 · Cited by 688
Basch, C. E. (2011) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00632.x · Cited by 521
Wu, P.-C., Huang, H.-M., Yu, H.-J., Fang, P.-C., & Chen, C.-T. (2016) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/apo.0000000000000236 · Cited by 357
Global contact lens prescribing 2000-2020
Morgan, P. B., & Efron, N. (2022) · Clinical and Experimental Optometry · doi:10.1080/08164622.2022.2033604 · Cited by 102
Vision and the Achievement Gap Among Urban Minority Youth
Basch, C. E. (2011) · Journal of School Health · doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2011.00633.x · Cited by 95
Metadata
- Authors
- Kleinstein, R. N.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-08-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1141
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2025003472
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refractive Error and Ethnicity in Children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.121.8.1141
- The paper
- Kleinstein, R. N. (2003). Refractive Error and Ethnicity in Children. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.8.1141
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.