The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Noninfectious Endophthalmitis Associated With Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injection
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Intravitreal injection of triamcinolone has been advocated to treat exudative macular diseases such as macular edema and choroidal neovascularization. OBJECTIVE: To describe 7 patients who developed a clinical picture simulating endophthalmitis after intravitreal triamcinolone injection. METHODS: Intravitreal triamcinolone injections were performed to treat refractory cystoid macular edema or diffuse macular edema associated with diabetic retinopathy, macular pucker, branch retinal vein occlusion, or pseudophakia. One patient received an injection in an attempt to treat exudation associated with occult choroidal neovascularization. RESULTS: Preinjection visual acuity ranged from 20/50 to 20/400. An extensive inflammatory response developed 1 to 2 days after injection in all 7 eyes. Five eyes had previously undergone vitrectomy. Four eyes had a layered hypopyon. All 7 eyes had an anterior chamber cellular reaction and vitritis. Visual acuity ranged from 20/400 to hand movements. The first 6 patients were treated for presumed endophthalmitis with vitreous cultures and intravitreal injections of antibiotics. All 6 cultures were negative for any organisms, and the eyes resolved their inflammatory response, with recovery to preinjection visual acuity or better. The seventh patient was treated with topical prednisolone without antibiotic therapy, and the inflammation resolved, with resolution of the macular edema seen before the intravitreal triamcinolone injection. CONCLUSION: It may be appropriate to closely observe noninfectious, toxic endophthalmitis in patients treated with intravitreal triamcinolone before assuming it to be infectious, especially in the absence of eye pain.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Penfold, P. L., Wong, J. G., Gyory, J., & Billson, F. A. (2001) · Clinical & Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1046/j.1442-9071.2001.00407.x · Cited by 97
Cited by
Complications of intravitreal injections
Sampat, K. M., & Garg, S. J. (2010) · Current Opinion in Ophthalmology · doi:10.1097/icu.0b013e328338679a · Cited by 287
Intraocular inflammation following intravitreal injection of bevacizumab
Bakri, S. J., Larson, T. A., & Edwards, A. O. (2008) · Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology · doi:10.1007/s00417-007-0754-7 · Cited by 102
Goldberg, R. A., Shah, C. P., Wiegand, T. W., & Heier, J. S. (2014) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2014.06.019 · Cited by 94
Aflibercept-Related Sterile Inflammation
Hahn, P., Kim, J. E., Stinnett, S., Chung, M. M., Dugel, P. U., Flynn, H. W., Huang, S. S., Sadda, S. R., & Mahmoud, T. H. (2013) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.11.018 · Cited by 74
Aflibercept-Related Sterile Intraocular Inflammation Outcomes
Greenberg, J. P., Belin, P., Butler, J., Feiler, D., Mueller, C., Tye, A., Friedlander, S. M., Emerson, G. G., & Ferrone, P. J. (2019) · Ophthalmology Retina · doi:10.1016/j.oret.2019.04.006 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Roth, D. B.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-09-01
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1279
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008309504
- Cited by
- 285
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 37.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninfectious Endophthalmitis Associated With Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.121.9.1279
- The paper
- Roth, D. B. (2003). Noninfectious Endophthalmitis Associated With Intravitreal Triamcinolone Injection. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.121.9.1279
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.