The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Rigid Contact Lenses on MyopiaProgression
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of rigid gas-permeable contact lenses (RGPs) and soft contact lenses (SCLs) on myopia progression in children. METHODS: We randomly assigned 116 subjects to wear RGPs or SCLs. Subjects underwent cycloplegic autorefraction, keratometry, and A-scan ultrasonographic axial length measurements at each annual visit. All analyses were conducted according to the original randomization assignment. The primary outcome measure was the 3-year change in spherical equivalent cycloplegic autorefraction. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD spherical equivalent cycloplegic refractive error progressed -1.56 +/- 0.95 diopters (D) for RGP wearers and -2.19 +/- 0.89 D for the SCL wearers during the 3 years of the study (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], P<.001). The axial growth of the eyes was not significantly different between treatment groups (ANCOVA, P = .57). The steep corneal meridian of the RGP wearers steepened 0.62 +/- 0.60 D, and that of the SCL wearers steepened 0.88 +/- 0.57 D during the 3 years (ANCOVA, P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: The RGP wearers' myopia progressed less than that of the SCL wearers. The corneal curvature of the SCL wearers steepened more than that of the RGP wearers, but the axial growth was not significantly different between the groups. Most refractive error treatment effect was limited to the first year of the trial. The results of the study provide information for eye care practitioners to share with their patients, but they do not indicate that RGPs should be prescribed primarily for myopia control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bozdogan, H. (1987) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02294361 · Cited by 4,468
Intention-to-Treat Analysis: Implications for Quantitative and Qualitative Research
NEWELL, D. J. (1992) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/21.5.837 · Cited by 715
Cited by
Parental History of Myopia, Sports and Outdoor Activities, and Future Myopia
Jones, L. A., Sinnott, L. T., Mutti, D. O., Mitchell, G. L., Moeschberger, M. L., & Zadnik, K. (2007) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.06-1118 · Cited by 769
IMI – Interventions for Controlling Myopia Onset and Progression Report
Wildsoet, C. F., Chia, A., Cho, P., Guggenheim, J. A., Polling, J. R., Read, S., Sankaridurg, P., Saw, S.-M., Trier, K., Walline, J. J., et al. (2019) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.18-25958 · Cited by 462
Self-citationInfluence of Overnight Orthokeratology on Axial Elongation in Childhood Myopia
Kakita, T., Hiraoka, T., & Oshika, T. (2011) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.10-5485 · Cited by 414
Myopia Control with Orthokeratology Contact Lenses in Spain: Refractive and Biometric Changes
Santodomingo-Rubido, J., Villa-Collar, C., Gilmartin, B., & Gutiérrez-Ortega, R. (2012) · Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science · doi:10.1167/iovs.11-8005 · Cited by 334
A Review of Current Concepts of the Etiology and Treatment of Myopia
Cooper, J., & Tkatchenko, A. V. (2018) · Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice · doi:10.1097/icl.0000000000000499 · Cited by 293
Metadata
- Authors
- Walline, J. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-12-01
- Volume
- 122
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1760
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2022750509
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Rigid Contact Lenses on MyopiaProgression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.122.12.1760
- The paper
- Walline, J. J. (2004). A Randomized Trial of the Effects of Rigid Contact Lenses on MyopiaProgression. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.122.12.1760
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.