Cited by 79Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsOcular Diseases and Behçet’s SyndromeRetinal Imaging and Analysis

High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, Other Markers of Inflammation, and the Incidence of Macular Degeneration in Women

Open access
Schaumberg, Debra A.·2007·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and other biomarkers of inflammation predict age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: We measured hsCRP, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (sICAM-1), and fibrinogen levels in baseline plasma samples from 27 687 participants with a mean age of 54.6 years and initially free of AMD in the Women's Health Study. We prospectively ascertained 150 cases of AMD with vision loss of 20/30 or worse in the affected eye by self-report confirmed with review of medical records during 275 852 person-years of follow-up (mean = 10 years) and used proportional hazards models to examine the relationship between these biomarkers and AMD. RESULTS: After adjustment for multiple risk factors, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval [CI]) of AMD, contrasting the highest vs lowest quintile of hsCRP, was 3.09 (1.39-6.88) (P trend = .02). In similar models, the HR (95% CI) for sICAM-1 was 1.87 (0.97-3.58) (P trend = .07). The relationship between fibrinogen and AMD was J-shaped, with an HR (95% CI) of 2.01 (1.07-3.75) for women in the highest fifth vs second fifth. CONCLUSION: Elevated circulating levels of hsCRP, sICAM-1, and fibrinogen precede the development of visually significant AMD in women, providing further support for the hypothesis that inflammation may play a role in AMD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.125.3.300

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 63 · Cited by 79

Authors
Schaumberg, D. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Schaumberg, Debra A.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
125
Issue
3
Pages
300
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2116134228
Cited by
79
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
7.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl043851-10)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01‐HL043851, HL43851)
  • National Eye Institute (EY06633, K23EY000365, EY013834, R01EY006633, R01EY017362, R01EY013834)
  • National Cancer Institute (CA-47988, R01CA047988)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Keywords
age-related macular degeneration, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1, fibrinogen, inflammation, biomarkers, women, incidence, Women's Health Study, plasma biomarkers
MeSH terms
Aged, C-Reactive Protein, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Fibrinogen, Humans, Inflammation, Macular Degeneration, Middle Aged, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, United States, Biomarkers, Incidence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Women's Health, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review