The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized Controlled Study of an Intravitreous Dexamethasone Drug Delivery System in Patients With Persistent Macular Edema
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a dexamethasone intravitreous drug delivery system (DDS) in patients with persistent (> or =90 days despite treatment) macular edema. METHODS: This 6-month study randomized 315 patients with persistent macular edema with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 20/40 to 20/200 in the study eye to observation or a single treatment with dexamethasone DDS, 350 or 700 microg. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of patients achieving a BCVA improvement of 10 or more letters or 15 or more letters, safety measures, change in fluorescein angiographic leakage, and central retinal thickness. RESULTS: At day 90 (primary end point), an improvement in BCVA of 10 letters or more was achieved by a greater proportion of patients treated with dexamethasone DDS, 700 microg (35%) or 350 microg (24%), than observed patients (13%; P<.001 vs 700-microg group; P = .04 vs 350-microg group); an improvement in BCVA of 15 letters or more was achieved in 18% of patients treated with dexamethasone DDS, 700 microg, vs 6% of observed patients (P = .006). Results were similar in patients with diabetic retinopathy, vein occlusion, or uveitis or Irvine-Gass syndrome. During 3 months of observation, 11% of treated patients and 2% of observed patients had intraocular pressure increases of 10 mm Hg or higher. CONCLUSION: In persistent macular edema, a single dexamethasone DDS treatment produced statistically significant BCVA improvements 90 days after treatment and was well tolerated for 180 days. Application to Clinical Practice Dexamethasone DDS, 700 microg, may have potential as a treatment for persistent macular edema.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Current and future ophthalmic drug delivery systems
del Amo, E. M., & Urtti, A. (2008) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2007.11.002 · Cited by 414
Retinal vein thrombosis: pathogenesis and management
REHAK, M., & WIEDEMANN, P. (2010) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03909.x · Cited by 253
Safety evaluation of ocular drug delivery formulations: Techniques and practical considerations
Short, B. G. (2008) · Toxicologic Pathology · doi:10.1177/0192623307310955 · Cited by 244
Ocular Drug Delivery to the Retina: Current Innovations and Future Perspectives
Kim, H. M., & Woo, S. J. (2021) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13010108 · Cited by 198
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuppermann, B. D.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2007-03-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 309
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1991049779
- Cited by
- 429
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized Controlled Study of an Intravitreous Dexamethasone Drug Delivery System in Patients With Persistent Macular Edema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.125.3.309
- The paper
- Kuppermann, B. D. (2007). Randomized Controlled Study of an Intravitreous Dexamethasone Drug Delivery System in Patients With Persistent Macular Edema. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.125.3.309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.