The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The 15-Year Cumulative Incidence of Retinal Vein Occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye Study
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the 15-year incidence of retinal vein occlusion (central retinal vein occlusion and branch retinal vein occlusion) and associated risk factors. METHODS: A population-based study where branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion were detected at baseline (n = 4068, 1988-1990) and three 5-year follow-up examinations by grading 30 degrees color fundus photographs. RESULTS: The 15-year cumulative incidences of branch retinal vein occlusion and central retinal vein occlusion were 1.8% and 0.5%, respectively. Using a generalized estimating equation model, incident retinal vein occlusion was related to baseline age (odds ratio [OR] per 10 years, 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-2.12), history of barbiturate use (OR, 5.30; 95% CI, 2.28-12.31), focal retinal arteriolar narrowing (OR, 2.45; 95% CI, 1.29-4.66), glaucoma (OR, 3.17; 95% CI, 1.50-6.69), serum ionized calcium level (OR per 0.4 mg/dL, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23-0.79), serum phosphorus level (OR per 0.3 mg/dL, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.30), and serum creatinine level (OR for > or = 1.4 vs < 1.4 mg/dL, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.00-2.59). Migraine headache history was associated with branch retinal vein occlusion (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.08-3.67). Diabetes history was associated with central retinal vein occlusion (OR, 6.35; 95% CI, 1.90-21.27). CONCLUSIONS: Incident retinal vein occlusion is not infrequent in the population, especially after age 65 years. The relationships of barbiturate use, serum creatinine level, serum ionized calcium level, and serum phosphorus level with incident retinal vein occlusion require further assessment in other large population-based studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevalence and Associations of Retinal Vein Occlusion in Australia: The Blue Mountains Eye Study
Mitchell, P. (1996) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140443012 · Cited by 545
Cited by
Ranibizumab for Macular Edema following Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
Brown, D. M., Campochiaro, P. A., Singh, R. P., Li, Z., Gray, S., Saroj, N., Rundle, A. C., Rubio, R. G., & Murahashi, W. Y. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.022 · Cited by 1,155
Ranibizumab for Macular Edema following Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Campochiaro, P. A., Heier, J. S., Feiner, L., Gray, S., Saroj, N., Rundle, A. C., Murahashi, W. Y., & Rubio, R. G. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.02.021 · Cited by 818
(2009) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archophthalmol.2009.234 · Cited by 674
Natural History of Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: An Evidence-Based Systematic Review
Rogers, S. L., McIntosh, R. L., Lim, L., Mitchell, P., Cheung, N., Kowalski, J. W., Nguyen, H. P., Wang, J. J., & Wong, T. Y. (2010) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.01.058 · Cited by 422
Song, P., Xu, Y., Zha, M., Zhang, Y., & Rudan, I. (2019) · Journal of Global Health · doi:10.7189/jogh.09.010427 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, R.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2008-04-01
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 513
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2054551550
- Cited by
- 404
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The 15-Year Cumulative Incidence of Retinal Vein Occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.126.4.513
- The paper
- Klein, R. (2008). The 15-Year Cumulative Incidence of Retinal Vein Occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.126.4.513
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.