Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 579

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Vision and Visual Perception.

Linksz, A.·1966·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

I have now been reading in this volume for the last two or three months, and I have not been through half of it yet. This is not a book to be read from cover to cover, but one from which to glean up-to-date information whenever needed. It is a unique piece of work. The blurb calls it a "landmark," and that is just what it is. It also is an example of things to come. Science is becoming so complex and science literature so vast that even a specialty within a specialty is becoming too much for one man to cover with authority. Giants like Duke-Elder, who encompasses the whole of ophthalmology, or polyhistors like Adler, who still is able to present us with all of ocular physiology, are becoming heroic examples of a bygone era. This book is the work of a team gathered around an outstanding visual

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050895033

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 579

Metadata

Authors
Linksz, A.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1966-06-01
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
893-894
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984571606
Cited by
579
References
0
FWCI
15.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vision and Visual Perception. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050895033
The paper
Linksz, A. (1966). Vision and Visual Perception. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1966.00970050895033

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.