The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Glaucoma in Mongolia: A Population-Based Survey in Hövsgöl Province, Northern Mongolia
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of glaucoma and suspect glaucoma, and to classify the cases detected according to mechanism. DESIGN: A population-based prevalence study. SETTING: Rural and urban locations in Hövsgöl province, northern Mongolia. PARTICIPANTS: Nine hundred forty-two (94.2%) of 1000 individuals 40 years of age and older were examined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Primary angle-closure glaucoma was diagnosed in subjects with previous acute or intermittent symptoms of angle closure and in individuals with an occludable angle and an intraocular pressure greater than 19 mm Hg or a glaucomatous visual field. RESULTS: The prevalence of manifest primary angle-closure glaucoma was 1.4% (14 subjects). The prevalence of gonioscopically occludable angles was 6.4% (64 subjects, including those with glaucoma). Primary open-angle glaucoma was diagnosed in 5 subjects (prevalence, 0.5%). As all these subjects were older than 60 years, the prevalence became 2.1% for this age group. Three cases (prevalence, 0.3%) of secondary open-angle glaucoma were detected. No cases of secondary angle-closure glaucoma were diagnosed. The prevalence of blindness was 1.2% (12 subjects), and primary glaucoma accounted for one third of these cases (4 subjects). CONCLUSIONS: We confirmed glaucoma as a major public health problem in northern Mongolia. Primary angle-closure glaucoma is more prevalent than primary open-angle glaucoma, supporting clinic-based data from other east Asian countries. Among the subjects examined, 97 (9.7%) had either manifest, latent, or suspect glaucoma. Neighboring populations may be similarly affected owing to a shared genetic heritage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Cited by
Global Prevalence of Glaucoma and Projections of Glaucoma Burden through 2040
Tham, Y.-C., Li, X., Wong, T. Y., Quigley, H. A., Aung, T., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2014) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013 · Cited by 7,159
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
Foster, P. J. (2002) · British Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1136/bjo.86.2.238 · Cited by 2,365
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Foster, P. J.
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1235
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2036847739
- Cited by
- 474
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Glaucoma in Mongolia: A Population-Based Survey in Hövsgöl Province, Northern Mongolia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140435011
- The paper
- Foster, P. J. (1996). Glaucoma in Mongolia: A Population-Based Survey in Hövsgöl Province, Northern Mongolia. Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1996.01100140435011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.