Cited by 131Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Imaging and AnalysisOphthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies

The Prevalence of Age-Related Maculopathy by Geographic Region and Ethnicity: The Colorado-Wisconsin Study of Age-Related Maculopathy

Cruickshanks, Karen J.·1997·Archives of Ophthalmology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of age-related maculopathy (ARM) in a biethnic population and to determine if there are ethnic and/or geographic differences in the prevalence of ARM. DESIGN: Prevalence data from 2 population-based studies, the San Luis Valley Diabetes Study (n = 1541, ages 21-74 years) and the Beaver Dam Eye Study (n = 3999, ages 43-74 years), were compared. SETTING: Southern Colorado and central Wisconsin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Color stereoscopic fundus photographs were graded for ARM using the Wisconsin Age-related Maculopathy Grading System. Similar questionnaire, laboratory, and clinical data on potential risk factors were available from both studies. RESULTS: Late-stage ARM was significantly less frequent among Hispanics than non-Hispanic whites (NHW) in Beaver Dam (odds ratio [OR] = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01-0.49; Hispanics vs Beaver Dam NHW). The prevalence of any ARM was significantly lower among San Luis Valley NHW (10.4%) than Beaver Dam NHW (14.3%) (OR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.50-0.91). This prevalence difference was not explained by any of the risk factors examined (smoking, cardiovascular disease, diabetes, alcohol consumption, etc). The 2 NHW groups reported different European heritages. CONCLUSIONS: Late-stage ARM appeared to be rare among Hispanics but there was no ethnic difference in prevalence of any ARM. The 33% difference in risk among NHW by geographic location was not reduced when controlling for possible risk factors or confounders, suggesting that genetic heritage may be an important determinant of risk for ARM.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150244015

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Age is the strongest risk factor for age-related macular degeneration; all population-based studies confirm that the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration increases with age in white individuals.

    “Age is the strongest risk factor for age-related macular degeneration; all population-based studies confirm that the prevalence of age-related macular degeneration increases with age in white individuals.3,22–27”

    From Age-related macular degeneration (2008) · cites this paper as [24]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 24 · Cited by 131

Authors
Cruickshanks, K. J.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Cruickshanks, Karen J.
Venue
Archives of Ophthalmology
Published
1997-02-01
Volume
115
Issue
2
Pages
242
ISSN
0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130145196
Cited by
131
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ey010252-02)
  • National Eye Institute (EY10252)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal Imaging and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Keywords
age-related maculopathy, prevalence, ethnic differences, Hispanic Americans, non-Hispanic whites, regional variation, genetic heritage, risk factors, Beaver Dam Eye Study
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Colorado, Ethnicity, Female, Fundus Oculi, Humans, Macular Degeneration, Male, Middle Aged, Photography, Risk Factors, Wisconsin, Prevalence, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review