The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Natural History and Clinical Management of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To provide clinical management guidelines for eyes with central retinal vein occlusion. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study with randomized clinical trials of specific subgroups of patients. Three-year follow-up every 4 months. SETTING: Nine ophthalmology practices. PATIENTS: Seven hundred twenty-five patients with central vein occlusion. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Iris neovascularization (INV), neovascular glaucoma, and visual acuity. RESULTS: Visual acuity outcome was largely dependent on initial acuity. Sixty-five percent of patients with initially good visual acuity (20/40 or better) maintained visual acuity in the same range at the end of the study. Patients with intermediate initial acuity (20/50-20/200) showed a variable outcome: 19% improved to better than 20/50, 44% stayed in the intermediate group, and 37% had final visual acuity worse than 20/200. Patients who had poor visual acuity at the first visit (< 20/200) had an 80% chance of having a visual acuity less than 20/200 at final visit, whether perfused or nonperfused initially. In the first 4 months of follow-up, 81 (15%) of the 547 eyes with perfusion converted to ischemia. During the next 32 months of follow-up, an additional 19% of eyes were found to have converted to ischemia for a total of 34% after 3 years. The development of nonperfusion or ischemia was most rapid in the first 4 months and progressed continuously throughout the entire duration of follow-up. Iris neovascularization of at least 2-clock hours, and/or angle neovascularization (ANV) developed in 117 (16%) of the 714 eyes. Sixty-one of the 117 eyes that had INV/ANV were initially categorized as nonperfused or indeterminate; 56 of the 117 eyes were initially categorized as perfused. When INV/ANV occurred, it was treated promptly with panretinal photocoagulation. The strongest predictors of INV/ANV were visual acuity (P < .001) and the amount of nonperfusion seen by fluorescein angiogram (P < .001). For eyes initially categorized as nonperfused or indeterminate, 35% (61/176) developed INV/ANV, compared with 10% (56/538) for eyes initially categorized as perfused. Other risk factors were venous tortuosity (P = .02), extensive retinal hemorrhage (P = .07), and duration less than 1 month (P = .08). Neovascular glaucoma that was unsuccessfully managed with medical treatment developed in only 10 eyes. No eye was enucleated. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity at baseline is a strong predictor of visual acuity at 3 years for eyes with good vision and eyes with poor vision, but a poor predictor for intermediate acuities. Visual acuity is also a strong predictor for the development of INV/ANV, as is nonperfusion. During the course of follow-up, one third of the eyes with perfusion converted to eyes with ischemia. Clinical management guidelines, developed from these and previously reported Central Vein Occlusion Study data, are presented.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Schmidt-Erfurth, U., Garcia-Arumi, J., Gerendas, B. S., Midena, E., Sivaprasad, S., Tadayoni, R., Wolf, S., & Loewenstein, A. (2019) · Ophthalmologica · doi:10.1159/000502041 · Cited by 284
Retinal vein thrombosis: pathogenesis and management
REHAK, M., & WIEDEMANN, P. (2010) · Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1111/j.1538-7836.2010.03909.x · Cited by 253
A Study of Surgical Approaches to Retinal Vascular Occlusions
Tang, W. M. (2000) · Archives of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1001/archopht.118.1.138 · Cited by 84
Augustin, A. J., Sahel, J.-A., Cerulli, L., Texier-Richard, B., Buchholz, P. M., & Kobelt, G. (2012) · European Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.5301/ejo.5000180 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Venue
- Archives of Ophthalmology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 486
- ISSN
- 0003-9950 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4235001346
- Cited by
- 663
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Natural History and Clinical Management of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150488006
- The paper
- Natural History and Clinical Management of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. (1997). Archives of Ophthalmology. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1997.01100150488006
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.