Internal Derangements of the Temporomandibular Joint: Pathological Variations
Abstract
A retrospective analysis of 540 operated cases (740 joints) of internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint was carried out. Observations of this patient population provided the basis for describing pathological variations of internal derangements. Radiologic studies, including tomograms and arthrograms or magnetic resonance scans, and surgical/pathological findings were correlated with clinical data in each case. It was found that clinical manifestations varied in a characteristic way and were directly related to the degree of pathological change and time course. Various stages of internal derangements were identified. Pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for the observed changes, as well as clinical signs and symptoms and causal factors, were discussed. Internal derangements are organic lesions that appear to be progressive and are probably of traumatic origin. The view is given that internal derangements represent the basic pathological entity responsible for clinical manifestations of what has been known as the temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction syndrome or similarly described conditions. Effective clinical management takes on new importance because progression to advanced degenerative states may occur.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most studies employed the DC/TMD diagnostic criteria and the Wilkes TMJ staging system.
“Most studies employed the DC/TMD diagnostic criteria [3,45], and the Wilkes TMJ staging system [46].”
The Wilkes classification system was applied in studies addressing disc displacement cases.
“The Wilkes classification system, which categorizes TMJ disorders, from mild disc displacement to advanced degenerative stages, was applied in studies addressing disc displacement cases [46].”
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chiaramonte, R., Ferrillo, M., de Sire, A., & Vecchio, M. (2026) · Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy · doi:10.1080/10669817.2026.2629282
“The Wilkes classification system, which categorizes TMJ disorders, from mild disc displacement to advanced degenerative stages, was applied in studies addressing disc displacement cases [46].”
- Authors
- Wilkes, C. H.
- Affiliations
- Abbott Northwestern Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wilkes, C. H.
- Venue
- Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1989-04-01
- Volume
- 115
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 469-477
- ISSN
- 0886-4470 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965804451
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 41 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 20.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Complementary and Manual Therapy › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
- Keywords
- temporomandibular joint, internal derangement, pathological variation, temporomandibular joint pain dysfunction syndrome, osteoarthritis, traumatic origin, clinical features, arthrography, magnetic resonance imaging, surgical pathology, pathophysiology
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Retrospective Studies, Temporomandibular Joint, Temporomandibular Joint Dysfunction Syndrome, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review