Anticipatory Guidance: What Information Do Parents Receive? What Information Do They Want?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether parents are receiving anticipatory guidance, whether they could use more information on anticipatory guidance topics, and how receipt of anticipatory guidance relates to satisfaction with care. DESIGN AND SAMPLE: Analysis of data from a telephone interview of 2017 respondents between July 1995 and January 1996. A stratified random-digit dialing design was used to obtain a nationally representative sample of parents with children between 0 and 3 years old. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Discussions with a physician or nurse about 6 anticipatory guidance topics and whether parents could use more information on these topics. Willingness of parents to pay extra to discuss these topics and receive additional care. Ratings of how well clinicians provide health care. RESULTS: The percentage of parents who had not discussed each subject with a clinician varied by topic: newborn care (< 3 months old), 38%; crying, 65%; sleep patterns, 59%; encouraging learning, 77%; discipline (ages 6-36 months), 75%; and toilet training (ages 18-36 months), 66%. Thirty-seven percent of parents had not discussed any of these topics. Among parents who had not discussed a particular issue, the percentage who reported that they could use more information ranged from 22% for both newborn care and crying to 55% for encouraging learning; similar percentages who had discussed the topics could also use more information. Parents who had discussed more of these topics with a clinician were more likely to report excellent care. Parents who could use more information on a larger number of topics were much more willing to pay for additional care. CONCLUSIONS: Although anticipatory guidance is considered an important component of well-child care, the majority of parents reported that they had not discussed most standard topics with a clinician. Many parents could use more information on these topics. Effort is required to provide parents with the information they need to take good care of their children. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;154:1191-1198.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In primary care, many families report not discussing desired topics on development and behavior.
“In primary care, many families report not discussing desired topics on development and behavior [60–62].”
From Family-Centered Care: Current Applications and Future Directions in Pediatric Health Care (2012) · cites this paper as [61]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 193
- Authors
- Schuster, M. A., Duan, N., Regalado, M., & Klein, D. J.
- Affiliations
- RAND Corporation (US)
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1191
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974676762
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 13.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Public Health Service (U48-CCU915773)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
- Keywords
- anticipatory guidance, well-child care, parent-physician communication, neonatal care, infant crying, infant sleep patterns, child discipline, toilet training, parental information needs, young children
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Child Guidance, Child Rearing, Data Collection, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Income, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Insurance, Health, Male, Parents, Pediatrics, Physician-Patient Relations, Logistic Models, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review