Cited by 247Antibiotic Use and ResistanceHealthcare cost, quality, practicesPneumonia and Respiratory Infections

Antibiotic prescribing by primary care physicians for children with upper respiratory tract infections

Nash, David R., Harman, Jeffrey, Wald, Ellen R., Kelleher, Kelly J.·2002·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

Objectives To determine if the rate of appropriate antibiotic use in the treatment of children with bronchitis, viral upper respiratory tract infections, sinusitis, otitis media, and pharyngitis has changed in recent years and to identify factors that are associated with the use of inappropriate antibiotic therapy. Design The National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey was used to examine the antimicrobial prescribing habits of physicians who provide primary care for children. Data were analyzed from 1995-1998. Setting Office-based physician practices. Participants Pediatricians, family physicians, and generalists completing survey forms for patients younger than 18 years. Main outcome measure The appropriate use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections. Results Multivariate analyses were used to examine factors associated with the use of inappropriate antibiotics to treat either upper respiratory tract infections or bronchitis. Patients seen in 1998 and diagnosed as having upper respiratory tract infections were 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.81) times less likely to be treated with antibiotics compared with patients seen in 1995. Multivariate analyses were also used to assess factors associated with the use of antibiotics with a suboptimal therapeutic profile for the treatment of either sinusitis or otitis media. Children diagnosed as having either sinusitis or otitis media were 0.3 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.48) times less likely to receive antib…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpedi.156.11.1114

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nash, D. R., Harman, J., Wald, E. R., & Kelleher, K. J.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2002-11-01
Volume
156
Issue
11
Pages
1114
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2079840577
Cited by
247
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 13
FWCI
7.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections
Keywords
antibiotic prescribing, upper respiratory tract infection, pediatric primary care, inappropriate antibiotic use, bronchitis, sinusitis, otitis media, pharyngitis, viral infection, antimicrobial stewardship
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bronchitis, Child, Child, Preschool, Drug Utilization, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Office Visits, Otitis Media, Pharyngitis, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Physicians, Family, Drug Prescriptions, Respiratory Tract Infections, Sinusitis, Multivariate Analysis, Unnecessary Procedures

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review