The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Breastfeeding and the Risk of Hospitalization for Respiratory Disease in Infancy: A Meta-analysis
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine breastfeeding and the risk of hospitalization for lower respiratory tract disease in healthy full-term infants with access to modern medical care. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, personal communication with researchers, the OVID databases, Dissertation Abstracts Online, and BIOSIS. STUDY SELECTION: The titles, abstracts, and text of studies from developed countries were explored for breastfeeding exposure measures and lower respiratory tract disease hospitalization rates. For summary statistics, we required 3 inclusion criteria: (1) a feeding contrast of a minimum of 2 months of exclusive breastfeeding (no formula supplementation) vs no breastfeeding and (2) study populations that excluded sick, low birth weight or premature infants and (3) reflected affluent regions; 27% of studies met these criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: We abstracted data from all relevant reports. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data from all primary material (33 studies) indicated a protective association between breastfeeding and the risk of respiratory disease hospitalization. Nine studies met all inclusion criteria, and 7 cohort studies were pooled. The feeding contrasts in these 7 studies were 4 or more months of exclusive breastfeeding vs no breastfeeding. The summary relative risk (95% confidence interval) was 0.28 (0.14-0.54), using a random-effects model. This effect remained stable and statistically significant after adjusting for the effects of smoking or socioeconomic status. CONCLUSION: Among generally healthy infants in developed nations, more than a tripling in severe respiratory tract illnesses resulting in hospitalizations was noted for infants who were not breastfed compared with those who were exclusively breastfed for 4 months.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect
Cook, R. J., & Sackett, D. L. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452 · Cited by 1,885
Cited by
Prolonged and Exclusive Breastfeeding Reduces the Risk of Infectious Diseases in Infancy
Duijts, L., Jaddoe, V. W. V., Hofman, A., & Moll, H. A. (2010) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.2008-3256 · Cited by 682
Breastfeeding and health outcomes for the mother-infant dyad
Dieterich, C. M., Felice, J. P., O’Sullivan, E., & Rasmussen, K. M. (2013) · Pediatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.pcl.2012.09.010 · Cited by 563
Metadata
- Authors
- Bachrach, V. R. G., Schwarz, E., & Bachrach, L. R.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 157
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 237
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008012989
- Cited by
- 369
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Breastfeeding and the Risk of Hospitalization for Respiratory Disease in Infancy: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpedi.157.3.237
- The paper
- Bachrach, V. R. G., Schwarz, E., & Bachrach, L. R. (2003). Breastfeeding and the Risk of Hospitalization for Respiratory Disease in Infancy: A Meta-analysis. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpedi.157.3.237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.