Comparison of MAST With Radioallergosorbent and Skin Tests for Diagnosis of Allergy in Children
Abstract
The multiple allergosorbent test system (MAST) is a method for measuring total and allergen-specific IgE levels, using autoradiography and densitometry. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of MAST tests with those of radioallergosorbent (RAST) and skin tests as an adjunct to the diagnosis of allergy in children. Twenty children, aged 4 to 19 years, were studied. Total serum IgE level measured by the paper radioimmunosorbent test (PRIST) method ranged from 7 to 1,333 units/mL (geometric mean, 155 units/mL). Total serum IgE level by MAST significantly correlated with the PRIST IgE level. Quantities of allergen-specific IgE measured by MAST and RAST were also significantly correlated. When the diagnostic levels by MAST and RAST were compared with skin test reactions for ragweed, grass, house dust, and mite, MAST had a sensitivity of 59%, a specificity of 97%, and an efficiency of 72%, compared with 67%, 97%, and 78%, respectively, for the RAST analysis. We conclude that MAST and RAST are similar in their ability to measure allergen-specific IgE level, but that neither method is as sensitive as skin tests for detection of allergen-specific IgE.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Specific IgE is in many ways equivalent to SPT.
“There is good evidence to show that sIgE is, in many ways, equivalent to SPT.218,818,925”
From International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis (2018) · cites this paper as [925]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Allergic Rhinitis
Wise, S. K., Lin, S. Y., Toskala, E., Orlandi, R. R., Akdis, C. A., Alt, J. A., Azar, A., Baroody, F. M., Bachert, C., Canonica, G. W., et al. (2018) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.22073 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
A comparison of skin prick tests, intradermal skin tests, and RASTs in the diagnosis of cat allergy
Wood, R. A., Phipatanakul, W., Hamilton, R. G., & Eggleston, P. A. (1999) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70419-7 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
- Authors
- Ownby, D. R.
- Affiliations
- Henry Ford Health (US)
- Corresponding author
- Ownby, Dennis R.
- ORCID
- Ownby, Dennis R.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1986-01-01
- Volume
- 140
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 45
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070392257
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 0.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Keywords
- radioallergosorbent test, skin testing, specific IgE, total IgE, sensitivity and specificity, ragweed, grass pollen, house dust, house dust mites
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Autoradiography, Child, Child, Preschool, Densitometry, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Immunoglobulin E, Immunosorbent Techniques, Radioallergosorbent Test, Radioimmunoassay, Skin Tests
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review