Cited by 10Child and Adolescent HealthPrimary Care and Health OutcomesHealthcare Systems and Technology

New Workforce, Practice, and Payment Reforms Essential for Improving Access to Pediatric Subspecialty Care Within the Medical Home

McManus, Margaret, Fox, Harriette, Limb, Stephanie, Arango, Polly, Armstrong, Peter, Azizkhan, Richard, Behrman, Richard, Chesney, Russell +16 more·2009·Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine

Abstract

The availability of pediatric subspecialty care is critically important to the health and well-being of infants, children, and adolescents. Moreover, timely collaboration with pediatric subspecialists is an essential element of the standard of care for children: the community-based medical home. In this model, primary care practice teams coordinate all care for a patient, including subspecialty care. Unfortunately, lack of access to pediatric subspecialty care within the medical home has reached crisis proportions in the United States owing to several interrelated factors: an insufficient number of pediatric subspecialists, dramatically increasing demand for pediatric subspecialty care, a fragmented system of pediatric primary and specialty care, and inadequate financing of medical education and collaborative primary and specialty pediatric care through the medical home. Recognizing the serious and widespread problems regarding access to pediatric subspecialty care, in 2004 the federal Maternal and Child Health Bureau convened the Expert Work Group on Pediatric Subspecialty Capacity. Its charge was to define the scope of the problem, identify promising approaches for extending pediatric subspecialty capacity, and develop recommendations. The group met 4 times between 2004 and 2007 and, through a series of key informant interviews, literature reviews, and analyses of pediatric subspecialty workforce data, prepared a series of reports and recommendations. This commentary is bas…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpediatrics.2009.8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most studies to date have been unable to directly control for children's clinical need for specialty services.

    “However, most studies to date have been unable to directly control for children's clinical need for specialty services.6,18”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McManus, M., Fox, H., Limb, S., Arango, P., Armstrong, P., Azizkhan, R., Behrman, R., Chesney, R., Grover, A., Gupta, V. B., Jewett, E., Jones, M. D., Kim, W. J., Lewy, J., Lighter, D., Mulvey, H., Pan, R., Schwartz, R., Sia, C., Stille, C., Stockman, J., Tait, V., Tonniges, T., & Willson, P.
Venue
Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
Published
2009-03-02
Volume
163
Issue
3
Pages
200
ISSN
1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2002908478
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2013: 4
FWCI
1.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship@UMassChan (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Healthcare Systems and Technology
Keywords
health care access, patient-centered medical home, workforce shortage, workforce expansion, payment reform, medical education funding, care fragmentation, Maternal and Child Health Bureau
MeSH terms
Workforce, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Medicaid, Pediatrics, Primary Health Care, United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review