Effect of Pathological Use of the Internet on Adolescent Mental Health: A Prospective Study
Abstract
Objective To examine the effect of pathological use of the Internet on the mental health, including anxiety and depression, of adolescents in China. It is hypothesized that pathological use of the Internet is detrimental to adolescents’ mental health. Design A prospective study with a randomly generated cohort from the population. Setting High schools in Guangzhou, China. Participants Adolescents aged between 13 and 18 years. Main exposure Pathological use of the Internet was assessed using the Pathological Use of the Internet Test. Outcome measures Depression and anxiety were assessed by the Zung Depression and Anxiety Scales. Results After adjusting for potential confounding factors, the relative risk of depression for those who used the Internet pathologically was about 21⁄2 times (incidence rate ratio,2.5;95%confidence interval,1.3-4.3) that of those who did not exhibit the targeted pathological internet use behaviors. No significant relationship between pathological use of the Internet and anxiety at follow-up was observed. Conclusions Results suggested that young people who are initially free of mental health problems but use the Internet pathologically could develop depression as a consequence. These results have direct implications for the prevention of mental illness in young people, particularly in developing countries.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Young subjects who engaged in the addicted use of the internet at the beginning of their study developed depressive symptoms nine months later.
“Lam and Peng (2010) found that young subjects who engaged in the addicted use of the internet at the beginning of their study developed depressive symptoms nine months later.”
From Ethics of the Attention Economy: The Problem of Social Media Addiction (2021) · cites this paper as Lam and Peng (2010)
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 23 · Cited by 217
- Authors
- Lam, L. T., & Peng, Z.-W.
- Affiliations
- The University of Notre Dame Australia (AU)
- ORCID
- Lam, Lawrence T.
- Venue
- Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2010-08-01
- Volume
- 164
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 901-6
- ISSN
- 1072-4710 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2152786348
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 27.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline@ND (The University of Notre Dame) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- internet addiction, adolescent mental health, depression, anxiety, adolescents, mental illness prevention
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Anxiety, China, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Prospective Studies, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regression Analysis, Risk, Poisson Distribution, Internet
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review