Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 459

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Clinicians' Judgments of Mental Health: A Proposed Scale

LUBORSKY, LESTER·1962·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Introduction and Aims The concept of "mental health" has become current in the everyday thinking of clinicians despite its global and diversely defined character. The members of the Psychotherapy Research Project of The Menninger Foundation wanted to know whether this concept had enough tangibility and unity of reference to be reliably judged along a single continuum by experienced observers. The vast literature does not deal extensively with this apparently simple question. Most contributors have worked on problems of definition (e.g., Senn,20Mayman15), although a small but expanding number of attempts have been made to measure specific criteria of health Lorr,10Rogers and Dymond,18Jahoda,8Kelman and Parloff,9Parloff17).* We came to this question in the early phases of the Psychotherapy Research Project26when a need was felt for a simple survey instrument to record shorthand judgments of

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1962.01720060019002

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 459

Metadata

Authors
LUBORSKY, L.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1962-12-01
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
407
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2069039029
Cited by
459
References
0
FWCI
9.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinicians' Judgments of Mental Health: A Proposed Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1962.01720060019002
The paper
LUBORSKY, L. (1962). Clinicians' Judgments of Mental Health: A Proposed Scale. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1962.01720060019002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.