The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Therapeutic Factors in Group Psychotherapy: A Review
Abstract
• This is a review of theoretical, empirical, and clinical research on therapeutic factors (TFs) in group psychotherapy covering the period 1955 to 1979. Therapeutic factors are processes that contribute to improvement in the patient's condition; they are different from conditions for change and from techniques. The following TFs are examined: self-disclosure, interaction, acceptance (cohesiveness), insight, catharsis, guidance, altruism, vicarious learning, instillation of hope, and an existential factor. Criteria for adequate experimental design in group research are proposed. About 40% of the works reviewed contain empirical studies; the quality of these studies is variable both conceptually and methodologically. It is difficult to assess the extent to which clinical practice has actually been influenced by this work on TFs.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Compared to individual therapy, group interventions may benefit from additional therapeutic factors and may have economic benefits [49, 50].”
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cohesion in group psychotherapy.
Burlingame, G. M., Fuhriman, A., & Johnson, J. E. (2001) · Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training · doi:10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.373 · Cited by 263
Malchiodi, C. A. (2002) · Cited by 314
Clinical Practice Guidelines for Group Psychotherapy
Bernard, H. S., Burlingame, G. M., Flores, P., Greene, L. R., Joyce, A. S., Kobos, J. C., Leszcz, M., Macnair-Semands, R. R., Piper, W. E., McEneaney, A. M. S., et al. (2008) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1521/ijgp.2008.58.4.455 · Cited by 183
Cohesion, Alliance and Outcome in Group Psychotherapy
Budman, S. H., Soldz, S., Demby, A., Feldstein, M., Springer, T., & Davis, M. S. (1989) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1989.11024456 · Cited by 165
The Contribution of Group Cohesion and Group Alliance to the Outcome of Group Psychotherapy
Marziali, E., Munroe-Blum, H., & McCleary, L. (1997) · International Journal of Group Psychotherapy · doi:10.1080/00207284.1997.11490846 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Bloch, S.
- Affiliations
- Warneford Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Bloch, Sidney
- ORCID
- Bloch, Sidney
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1981-05-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 519
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W612911555
- Cited by
- 222
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
- Keywords
- therapeutic factors, group therapy, self-disclosure, group cohesion, catharsis, observational learning, altruism, guidance, insight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review