The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress in Pharmacotherapy of Borderline Disorders: A Double-blind Study of Amitriptyline, Haloperidol, and Placebo
Abstract
In symptomatic patients with borderline disorder, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of haloperidol and amitriptyline hydrochloride to test the differential efficacy of medication against the affective and schizotypal symptoms that characterize the disorder. Sixty-one patients, diagnosed by the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline of Gunderson et al, completed randomized trials of haloperidol (n = 21), amitriptyline (n = 20), and placebo (n = 20). Medications were given in dose ranges of 4 to 16 mg for haloperidol (mean, 7.24 mg) and 100 to 175 mg for amitriptyline hydrochloride (mean, 147.62 mg) for five-week periods, with weekly self-rated and observer-rated measures of mood, schizotypal symptoms, and global functioning. Haloperidol was superior to both amitriptyline and placebo on a composite measure of overall symptom severity, with no difference between amitriptyline and placebo. Haloperidol produced significant improvement on a broad spectrum of symptom patterns, including depression, anxiety, hostility, paranoid ideation, and psychoticism. In contrast, amitriptyline was minimally effective, with small gains limited to some areas of depressive content. The magnitude of change tended to be modest and was more apparent in self-rated than observer-rated measures.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
Cited by
Borderline personality disorder
Lieb, K., Zanarini, M. C., Schmahl, C., Linehan, M. M., & Bohus, M. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16770-6 · Cited by 1,369
A psychobiological perspective on the personality disorders
(1991) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.148.12.1647 · Cited by 659
Central Serotonin and Impulsive Aggression
Coccaro, E. F. (1989) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000291769 · Cited by 451
Borderline Personality Disorder: Ontogeny of a Diagnosis
Gunderson, J. G. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.08121825 · Cited by 315
Pharmacological interventions for borderline personality disorder
Stoffers, J., Völlm, B. A., Rücker, G., Timmer, A., Huband, N., & Lieb, K. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd005653.pub2 · Cited by 302
Metadata
- Authors
- Soloff, P. H.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1986-07-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 691
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2017306771
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress in Pharmacotherapy of Borderline Disorders: A Double-blind Study of Amitriptyline, Haloperidol, and Placebo. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800070081010
- The paper
- Soloff, P. H. (1986). Progress in Pharmacotherapy of Borderline Disorders: A Double-blind Study of Amitriptyline, Haloperidol, and Placebo. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1986.01800070081010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.