The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gating and Habituation of the Startle Reflex in Schizophrenic Patients
Abstract
Schizophrenic patients exhibit impairments in both sensorimotor gating and habituation in a number of paradigms. Through human and animal model research, these fundamental cognitive deficits have well-described neurobiologic bases and offer insights into the neuroanatomic and neurotransmitter abnormalities that characterize patients with schizophrenic spectrum disorders. In this context, the startle response is particularly interesting, because it is a cross-species response to strong stimuli that is plastic or alterable using experimental and neurobiologic manipulations. Thirty-nine medicated schizophrenic patients and 37 normal control subjects were studied in a new electromyography based startle response paradigm in which both prepulse inhibition (an operational measure of sensorimotor gating) and habituation (the normal decrease in response magnitude to repeated stimuli over time) can be separated and assessed in one test session. The results indicate that schizophrenic patients have extensive deficits in both intramodal and cross-modal sensorimotor gating and a trend to show acoustic startle habituation deficits. The deficit in prepulse inhibition of startle amplitude exhibited by schizophrenic patients was evident when an acoustic prepulse stimulus preceded either an acoustic or a tactile startle stimulus. No deficit was observed in the prepulse-induced facilitation of startle latencies, indicating that the failure of gating was not due to a failure of stimulus detection. These findings suggest centrally mediated deficits in sensorimotor gating in schizophrenic patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Frith, C. D. (1987) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700025873 · Cited by 655
Gottschalk, L. A. (1972) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750280019004 · Cited by 51
Cited by
The Endophenotype Concept in Psychiatry: Etymology and Strategic Intentions
Gottesman, I. I., & Gould, T. D. (2003) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636 · Cited by 5,615
Geyer, M. A., Krebs-Thomson, K., Braff, D. L., & Swerdlow, N. R. (2001) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130100811 · Cited by 1,484
Self-citationJentsch, J. (1999) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00060-8 · Cited by 1,314
Linkage of a neurophysiological deficit in schizophrenia to a chromosome 15 locus
Freedman, R., Coon, H., Myles-Worsley, M., Orr-Urtreger, A., Olincy, A., Davis, A., Polymeropoulos, M., Holik, J., Hopkins, J., Hoff, M., et al. (1997) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.94.2.587 · Cited by 1,141
Swerdlow, N., Geyer, M., & Braff, D. (2001) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s002130100799 · Cited by 1,050
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Braff, D. L.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1992-03-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 206
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2097759310
- Cited by
- 1,027
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gating and Habituation of the Startle Reflex in Schizophrenic Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820030038005
- The paper
- Braff, D. L. (1992). Gating and Habituation of the Startle Reflex in Schizophrenic Patients. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820030038005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.