The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of Services by Persons With Mental and Addictive Disorders: Findings From the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program
Abstract
The use of ambulatory and inpatient mental health and addiction services in the United States was estimated by means of data from the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program standardized to the 1980 US census for adults 18 years of age and older. In a 1-year period, 22.8 million people used ambulatory services for mental or addictive disorder treatment; 54% of them had a current Diagnostic Interview Schedule/DSM-III mental disorder and another 37.4% had a history of psychiatric disorder or significant psychiatric symptoms. A total of 325.9 million ambulatory visits were made, and the average number of visits per treated person per year was 14.3. There were 1.4 million persons admitted to at least one inpatient mental health or addiction setting during a 1-year period; 80% of them had a current DIS/DSM-III disorder, and the remainder had a history of psychiatric disorder or significant psychiatric symptoms. Results were determined for specific mental and substance use diagnoses and service settings. Among treated persons with any mental or addictive disorder, the majority of visits were to mental and addictive disorders specialty settings (40.5% of total visits) and to support networks composed of friends, relatives, and self-help groups (37.0% of total visits). Although a large number of persons with mental and substance use disorders were seen in the general medical sector for mental health or addiction problems, they were seen less frequently and therefore made fewer visits to this sector (10.9% of total visits).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
Cited by
The prevalence of DSM-IV personality disorders in psychiatric outpatients
Zimmerman, M., Rothschild, L., & Chelminski, I. (2005) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1911 · Cited by 825
A Multifaceted Intervention to Improve Treatment of Depression in Primary Care
Katon, W. (1996) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100072009 · Cited by 835
Treatment utilization by patients with personality disorders
Bender, D. S., Dolan, R. T., Skodol, A. E., Sanislow, C. A., Dyck, I. R., McGlashan, T. H., Shea, M. T., Zanarini, M. C., Oldham, J. M., & Gunderson, J. G. (2001) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.158.2.295 · Cited by 779
Adequacy of Treatment for Serious Mental Illness in the United States
Wang, P. S., Demler, O., & Kessler, R. C. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.1.92 · Cited by 581
Psychological approaches in the treatment of specific phobias: A meta-analysis
Wolitzky-Taylor, K. B., Horowitz, J. D., Powers, M. B., & Telch, M. J. (2008) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.007 · Cited by 530
Metadata
- Authors
- Narrow, W. E.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1993-02-01
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 95
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985471614
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 44.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of Services by Persons With Mental and Addictive Disorders: Findings From the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140017002
- The paper
- Narrow, W. E. (1993). Use of Services by Persons With Mental and Addictive Disorders: Findings From the National Institute of Mental Health Epidemiologic Catchment Area Program. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820140017002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.