Cited by 910Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Naturalistic Follow-up of a Behavioral Treatment for Chronically Parasuicidal Borderline Patients

Linehan, Marsha M.·1993·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Background A randomized clinical trial was conducted to evaluate whether the superior performance of dialectical behavior therapy (DBT), a psychosocial treatment for borderline personality disorder, compared with treatment-as-usual in the community, is maintained during a 1-year posttreatment follow-up. Methods We analyzed 39 women who met criteria for borderline personality disorder, defined by Gunderson's Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Personality Disorder and DSM-III-R criteria, and who had a history of parasuicidal behavior. Subjects were randomly assigned either to 1 year of DBT, a cognitive behavioral therapy that combines individual psychotherapy with group behavioral skills training, or to treatment-as-usual, which may or may not have included individual psychotherapy. Efficacy was measured on parasuicidal behavior (Parasuicide History Interview), psychiatric inpatient days (Treatment History Interview), anger (State-Trait Anger Scale), global functioning (Global Assessment Scale), and social adjustment (Social Adjustment Scale--Interview and Social Adjustment Scale--Self-Report). Subjects were assessed at 6 and 12 months into the follow-up year. Results Comparison of the two conditions revealed that throughout the follow-up year, DBT subjects had significantly higher Global Assessment Scale scores. During the initial 6 months of the follow-up, DBT subjects had significantly less parasuicidal behavior, less anger, and better self-reported social adjustment. Durin…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820240055007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 11 · Cited by 910

Authors
Linehan, M. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Linehan, Marsha M.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1993-12-01
Volume
50
Issue
12
Pages
971
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1972279079
Cited by
910
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 37
FWCI
13.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH-34486, R01MH034486)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
dialectical behavior therapy, borderline personality disorder, parasuicide, maintenance therapy, long-term follow-up, cognitive behavioral therapy, anger, social adaptation, women
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Anger, Behavior Therapy, Borderline Personality Disorder, Chronic Disease, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Humans, Middle Aged, Personality Inventory, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotherapy, Social Adjustment, Suicide

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review