The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: Rationale, Unique Features, and Training
Abstract
This article reports on the development and reliability of the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies (DIGS), a clinical interview especially constructed for the assessment of major mood and psychotic disorders and their spectrum conditions. The DIGS, which was developed and piloted as a collaborative effort of investigators from sites in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Genetics Initiative, has the following additional features: (1) polydiagnostic capacity; (2) a detailed assessment of the course of the illness, chronology of psychotic and mood syndromes, and comorbidity; (3) additional phenomenologic assessments of symptoms; and (4) algorithmic scoring capability. The DIGS is designed to be employed by interviewers who exercise significant clinical judgment and who summarize information in narrative form as well as in ratings. A two-phase test-retest (within-site, between-site) reliability study was carried out for DSM-III-R criteria-based major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and schizoaffective disorder. Reliabilities using algorithms were excellent (0.73 to 0.95), except for schizoaffective disorder, for which disagreement on estimates of duration of mood syndromes relative to psychosis reduced reliability. A final best-estimate process using medical records and information from relatives as well as algorithmic diagnoses is expected to be more reliable in making these distinctions. The DIGS should be useful as part of archival data gathering for genetic studies of major affective disorders, schizophrenia, and related conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID): I: History, Rationale, and Description
Spitzer, R. L. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820080032005 · Cited by 4,336
Cited by
Sheline, Y. I., Sanghavi, M., Mintun, M. A., & Gado, M. H. (1999) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.19-12-05034.1999 · Cited by 1,382
“The DIGS is a structured interview with high reliability (Nurnberger et al., 1993) that was used to make the diagnosis of past episodes of recurrent major depression by Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV criteria and to exclude other psychiatric diagnoses.”
BackgroundMethodHigh rates of schizophrenia in adults with velo-cardio-facial syndrome
Murphy, K. C., Jones, L. A., & Owen, M. J. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.10.940 · Cited by 1,024
Levis, B., Negeri, Z., Sun, Y., Benedetti, A., & Thombs, B. D. (2020) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.m4022 · Cited by 922
Baum, A. E., Akula, N., Cabanero, M., Cardona, I., Corona, W., Klemens, B., Schulze, T. G., Cichon, S., Rietschel, M., Nöthen, M. M., et al. (2008) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4002012 · Cited by 700
Comparative genetic architectures of schizophrenia in East Asian and European populations
Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, Lam, M., Indonesia Schizophrenia Consortium, Genetic REsearch on schizophreniA neTwork-China and the Netherlands (GREAT-CN), Chen, C.-Y., Li, Z., Martin, A. R., Bryois, J., Ma, X., Gaspar, H., et al. (2019) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0512-x · Cited by 655
Metadata
- Authors
- Nurnberger, J. I.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1994-11-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 849
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966111889
- Cited by
- 2,053
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 12.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: Rationale, Unique Features, and Training. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002
- The paper
- Nurnberger, J. I. (1994). Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies: Rationale, Unique Features, and Training. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950110009002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.