Perceived Coercion in Mental Hospital Admission: Pressures and Process
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients' perceptions of coercion in admission may affect their attitude toward subsequent treatment, including their inclination to adhere to treatment plans. This study looks at the determinants of patients' perceptions of coercion. METHODS: A sample of 157 patients admitted to a rural Virginia state hospital and a Pennsylvania community hospital were interviewed within 48 hours of admission about their experience of coming to the hospital. All subjects were 17 years or older. Diagnoses were diverse, and 42% were involuntarily committed. The interview gathered an open-ended description of the admission experience followed by a structured interview that included several measures. RESULTS: Perceptions of being respectfully included in a fair decision-making process ("procedural justice") and legal status were most closely associated with perceived coercion, and a significant relationship was found with perceived negative pressures, ie, force and threats. However, only procedural justice was related to the perception of coercion at both sites and with both voluntary and involuntary patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients' feelings of being coerced concerning admission appears to be closely related to their sense of procedural justice. It may be that clinicians can minimize the experience of coercion even among those legally committed by attending more closely to procedural justice issues.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Numerous quantitative studies have found an inverse relationship between levels of procedural justice and levels of perceived coercion.
“Numerous quantitative studies have found an inverse relationship between levels of procedural justice and levels of perceived coercion [15,24,34,38,42,45,48,54,55,65,92,95,105,107,147,156].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
Four studies specifically reported that a lack of procedural justice heightened perceived coercion even among voluntarily admitted patients.
“Four studies specifically reported that a lack of procedural justice heightened perceived coercion even among voluntarily admitted patients [24,34,42,105].”
From Factors Associated with Perceived Coercion in Adults Receiving Psychiatric Care: A Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [34]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 273
- Authors
- Lidz, C. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lidz, Charles W.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1995-12-01
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1034
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2140563328
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Network (American Medical Association) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- perceived coercion, involuntary psychiatric admission, procedural justice, patient perspectives, legal status, voluntary admission, medication adherence
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Mental Disorders, Coercion, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Perception, Regression Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review