The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Treating Major Depression in Primary Care Practice: Eight-Month Clinical Outcomes
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We studied whether standardized treatments of major depression whose efficacy was established with psychiatric patients are equally effective when provided to primary care patients, and whether standardized treatments are more effective than a primary care physician's usual care. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted, in which primary care patients meeting DSM-III-R criteria for a current major depression were assigned to nortriptyline (n = 91) or interpersonal psychotherapy (n = 93) provided within well-structured parameters, or a physician's usual care (n = 92). The main outcome measures were degree and rate of improvement in severity of depressive symptoms and proportion of patients recovered at 8 months. RESULTS: Severity of depressive symptoms was reduced more rapidly and more effectively among patients randomized to pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy than among patients assigned to a physician's usual care. Among treatment completers, approximately 70% of patients participating in the full pharmacotherapy or psychotherapy protocol but only 20% of usual care patients were judged as recovered at 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy effectively treat major depression among primary care patients when provided within specific parameters and for the full acute and continuation phases. Treatment principles recommended by the Depression Guideline Panel of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research are supported.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
An inventory for measuring depression
BECK, A. T. (1961) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004 · Cited by 38,032
Robins, L. N. (1981) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1981.01780290015001 · Cited by 5,219
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
Elkin, I. (1989) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1989.01810110013002 · Cited by 2,300
The Functioning and Well-being of Depressed Patients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1989) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1989.03430070062031 · Cited by 2,130
Frank, E. (1991) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1991.01810330075011 · Cited by 1,959
The Course of Depression in Adult Outpatients: Results From the Medical Outcomes Study
Wells, K. B. (1992) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820100032007 · Cited by 475
Ormel, J. (1993) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820220009001 · Cited by 216
Clarke, G. N. (1995) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-006x.63.5.718 · Cited by 193
Cited by
Case-finding instruments for depression: Two questions are as good as many
Whooley, M. A., Avins, A. L., Miranda, J., & Browner, W. S. (1997) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x · Cited by 1,826
Cost of Lost Productive Work Time Among US Workers With Depression
Stewart, W. F. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.23.3135 · Cited by 1,421
Bower, P., & Gilbody, S. (2005) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.186.1.11 · Cited by 1,084
Wells, K. B., Sherbourne, C., Schoenbaum, M., Duan, N., Meredith, L., Unützer, J., Miranda, J., Carney, M. F., & Rubenstein, L. V. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.2.212 · Cited by 1,021
Bauer, M., Pfennig, A., Severus, E., Whybrow, P. C., Angst, J., Möller, H.-J., & Šon behalf of the Task Force on Unipolar Depressive Disorders (2013) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.3109/15622975.2013.804195 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Schulberg, H. C.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1996-10-01
- Volume
- 53
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 913
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2057699322
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 15.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treating Major Depression in Primary Care Practice: Eight-Month Clinical Outcomes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100061008
- The paper
- Schulberg, H. C. (1996). Treating Major Depression in Primary Care Practice: Eight-Month Clinical Outcomes. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1996.01830100061008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.