Cited by 147Grief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

A Prospective Study of Risk Factors Predicting Grief Intensity Following Pregnancy Loss

Janssen, Hettie J. E. M.·1997·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This prospective longitudinal study investigated which selected person-oriented, social environment, demographic, and pregnancy-related risk factors could best predict women's grief intensity following pregnancy loss. METHOD: In a prospective longitudinal study, 2140 pregnant women within 12 weeks' gestation answered a first questionnaire in writing. Of this sample, 227 women experienced an involuntary pregnancy loss and were followed up for a period of 18 months, during which grief was reassessed four times, using the Perinatal Grief Scale. The prospectively measured risk factors were hierarchically ordered and linked to each woman's individual grief response over time. RESULTS: The hypothesized risk factors, with the exception of a prior pregnancy loss, significantly related to grief intensity following the pregnancy loss and together explained 35% of the variance in grief scores among subjects. Gestational age, preloss neurotic personality, preloss psychiatric symptoms, and family composition showed the strongest relation to grief intensity following a pregnancy loss. Only psychiatric symptoms showed an interaction with time in that the women who evidenced more psychiatric symptoms before the pregnancy loss showed more intense grief shortly following the pregnancy loss. The other risk factors had a constant effect, irrespective of the time that had passed since the loss. CONCLUSION: A relatively long preloss pregnancy, a more neurotic personality, more preloss psychiatric symptoms, and the absence of living children appear to be important risk factors for stronger grief responses in women following a pregnancy loss.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830130062013

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A consistent feeling of guilt is commonly experienced after pregnancy loss and is associated with complicated grief reactions.

    “A consistent feeling of guilt is commonly experienced after pregnancy loss and is associated with CG reactions.8,19,20”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Women with a relatively high degree of neurotic personality characteristics before loss are more likely to develop intense grief reactions after the infant's death.

    “Personality has been found to be another significant predictor, with women shown to have a relatively high degree of neurotic personality characteristics before loss being more likely to develop intense grief reactions after the infant's death.8”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • In normal grieving after pregnancy loss, grief declines over a period of 2 years.

    “Longitudinal studies have demonstrated that in a normal grieving process, grief declines over a period of 2 years after the pregnancy loss.8,10”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • In normal grieving, grief symptoms usually decrease in intensity over the first 12 months after loss.

    “As has been found in bereavement involving first-degree relatives, grief symptoms usually decrease in intensity over the first 12 months.8,9”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Poor social support from family and friends is associated with complicated grief reactions after perinatal loss.

    “Based on stress theory, social support is thought to have a buffering effect, and poor social support from family and friends is associated with CG reactions.8,10,13,32”

    From Complicated grief after perinatal loss (2012) · cites this paper as [8]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 147

Authors
Janssen, H. J. E. M.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Corresponding author
Janssen, Hettie J. E. M.
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
1997-01-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
56
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2092640685
Cited by
147
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
perinatal grief, miscarriage, risk factors, grief intensity, neurotic personality, psychiatric symptoms, gestational age, family structure, single mothers, Perinatal Grief Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Family Characteristics, Female, Gestational Age, Grief, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Parity, Personality Inventory, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Social Support, Time Factors, Comorbidity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review