The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Detecting Personality Disorders in a Nonclinical Population: Application of a 2-Stage Procedure for Case Identification
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is no epidemiology of personality disorders (PDs) comparable with that currently available for most other mental disorders. One reason for this is that an Axis II diagnosis usually requires considerable clinical sophistication and it is expensive to deploy clinicians rather than trained laypersons to examine large community samples. This study explores the feasibility of using a 2-stage method in which only subjects who were screened as positive for PD would be interviewed by clinicians. METHODS: University students were screened with a self-administered Axis II inventory and subsequently interviewed by clinicians with the use of the International Personality Disorder Examination. RESULTS: The screen detected all individuals who subsequently received a definite diagnosis on the interview, and a specificity rate of detection was 61%. The point-prevalence estimate for diagnosable PD in this nonclinical population was 11.01% (95% confidence interval, 7.57%-14.52%). CONCLUSION: If these results can be replicated in a more representative community sample, this 2-stage method might substantially reduce the number of persons who needed to be interviewed in a major epidemiological study of PDs, with little or no loss in diagnostic accuracy, while presumably lowering the cost of such an investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Loranger, A. W. (1994) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950030051005 · Cited by 1,069
Cited by
Grant, B. F., Chou, S. P., Goldstein, R. B., Huang, B., Stinson, F. S., Saha, T. D., Smith, S. M., Dawson, D. S., Pulay, A. J., Pickering, R. P., et al. (2008) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v69n0404 · Cited by 1,618
DSM-IV Personality Disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication
Lenzenweger, M. F., Lane, M. C., Loranger, A. W., & Kessler, R. C. (2007) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.09.019 · Cited by 1,352
Self-citationThe Prevalence of Personality Disorders in a Community Sample
Torgersen, S., Kringlen, E., & Cramer, V. (2001) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.6.590 · Cited by 1,313
Evaluating three treatments for borderline personality disorder: a multiwave study
Clarkin, J. F., Levy, K. N., Lenzenweger, M. F., & Kernberg, O. F. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2007.164.6.922 · Cited by 997
Self-citationPrevalence and correlates of personality disorder in Great Britain
Coid, J., Yang, M., Tyrer, P., Roberts, A., & Ullrich, S. (2006) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.188.5.423 · Cited by 901
Metadata
- Authors
- Lenzenweger, M. F.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-04-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 345
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2092294132
- Cited by
- 251
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detecting Personality Disorders in a Nonclinical Population: Application of a 2-Stage Procedure for Case Identification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160073010
- The paper
- Lenzenweger, M. F. (1997). Detecting Personality Disorders in a Nonclinical Population: Application of a 2-Stage Procedure for Case Identification. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830160073010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.