The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Randomized Trial of Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Persons With Severe Mental Illness
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This experiment evaluated the effectiveness of an innovative program of assertive community treatment (ACT) for homeless persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses. METHODS: One hundred fifty-two homeless persons with severe and persistent mental illness were randomized to either the experimental ACT program or to usual community services. Baseline assessments included the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Quality-of-Life Interview, Colorado Symptom Index, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey. All assessments (except the Structured Clinical Interview) were repeated at the 2-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up evaluations. RESULTS: Subjects in the ACT program used significantly fewer psychiatric inpatient days, fewer emergency department visits, and more psychiatric outpatient visits than the comparison subjects. The ACT subjects also spent significantly more days in stable community housing, and they experienced significantly greater improvements in symptoms, life satisfaction, and perceived health status. CONCLUSIONS: Relative to usual community care, the ACT program for homeless persons with severe and persistent mental illness shifts the locus of care from crisis-oriented services to ongoing outpatient care and produces better housing, clinical, and life satisfaction outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stein, L. I. (1980) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1980.01780170034003 · Cited by 1,902
Cited by
The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements
Dixon, L. B., Dickerson, F., Bellack, A. S., Bennett, M., Dickinson, D., Goldberg, R. W., Lehman, A., Tenhula, W. N., Calmes, C., Pasillas, R. M., et al. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp115 · Cited by 774
Self-citationBond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Mueser, K. T., & Latimer, E. (2001) · Disease Management and Health Outcomes · doi:10.2165/00115677-200109030-00003 · Cited by 614
Treatment engagement of individuals experiencing mental illness: review and update
Dixon, L. B., Holoshitz, Y., & Nossel, I. (2016) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20306 · Cited by 550
The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): Updated Treatment Recommendations 2009
Kreyenbuhl, J., Buchanan, R. W., Dickerson, F. B., & Dixon, L. B. (2010) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/sbp130 · Cited by 499
Intensive case management for severe mental illness
Dieterich, M., Irving, C. B., Park, B., & Marshall, M. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007906.pub2 · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Lehman, A. F.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1997-11-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1038
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2051446145
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 30.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Randomized Trial of Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Persons With Severe Mental Illness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230076011
- The paper
- Lehman, A. F. (1997). A Randomized Trial of Assertive Community Treatment for Homeless Persons With Severe Mental Illness. Archives of General Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1997.01830230076011
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.