Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Applications in Neuropsychiatry
Abstract
In the 1990s, it is difficult to open a newspaper or watch television and not find someone claiming that magnets promote healing. Rarely do these claims stem from double-blind, peer-reviewed studies, making it difficult to separate the wheat from the chaff. The current fads resemble those at the end of the last century, when many were falsely touting the benefits of direct electrical and weak magnetic stimulation. Yet in the midst of this popular interest in magnetic therapy, a new neuroscience field has developed that uses powerful magnetic fields to alter brain activity--transcranial magnetic stimulation. This review examines the basic principles underlying transcranial magnetic stimulation, and describes how it differs from electrical stimulation or other uses of magnets. Initial studies in this field are critically summarized, particularly as they pertain to the pathophysiology and treatment of neuropsychiatric disorders. Transcranial magnetic stimulation is a promising new research and, perhaps, therapeutic tool, but more work remains before it can be fully integrated in psychiatry's diagnostic and therapeutic armamentarium.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
TMS is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that works by creating a brief and strong localized pulsed magnetic field over the surface of the head that induces electrical currents in targeted brain regions.
“TMS is a noninvasive neuromodulation technique that works by creating a brief and strong localized pulsed magnetic field over the surface of the head that induces electrical currents in targeted brain regions (George et al., 1999).”
From Neurocognitive effects of theta burst stimulation for treatment-resistant depression in adults: A systematic review and recommendations for future research (2025) · cites this paper as George et al., 1999
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 122 · Cited by 496
- Authors
- George, M. S., Lisanby, S. H., & Sackeim, H. A.
- Affiliations
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 1999-04-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 300
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1971992037
- Cited by
- 496
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 23.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (MH35636)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
- Keywords
- transcranial magnetic stimulation, neuropsychiatric disorders, neuromodulation, magnetotherapy, brain activity modulation, treatment-resistant depression, epilepsy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Haplorhini, Mental Disorders, Brain, Clinical Trials as Topic, Depressive Disorder, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Biological, Treatment Outcome, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review