Cited by 250Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Efficacy of a Mixed Amphetamine Salts Compound in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

Spencer, Thomas, Biederman, Joseph, Wilens, Timothy, Faraone, Stephen, Prince, Jefferson, Gerard, Kristine, Doyle, Robert, Parekh, Asha +2 more·2001·Archives of General Psychiatry

Abstract

Background We report on a controlled trial of a mixed amphetamine salts compound (Adderall, dextroamphetamine sulfate, dextro-, levoamphetamine sulfate, dextroamphetamine aspartate, levoamphetamine aspartate, and dextroamphetamine saccharate) in the treatment of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Methods This was a 7-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study of Adderall in 27 well-characterized adults satisfying full DSM-IV criteria for ADHD of childhood onset and persistent symptoms into adulthood. Medication was titrated up to 30 mg twice a day. Outcome measures included the ADHD Rating Scale and the Clinical Global Impression Score. Comorbid psychiatric disorders were assessed to test for potential effects on treatment outcome. Results Treatment with Adderall at an average oral dose of 54 mg (administered in 2 daily doses) was effective and well tolerated. Drug-specific improvement in ADHD symptoms was highly significant overall (42% decrease on the ADHD Rating Scale, P or =30%) was significantly higher with Adderall treatment than with a placebo (70% vs 7%; P =.001). Conclusions Adderall was effective and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of adults with ADHD. More work is needed to evaluate the long-term effects of Adderall, or other amphetamine compounds, in the treatment of adults with ADHD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/archpsyc.58.8.775

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 48 · Cited by 250

Authors
Spencer, T., Biederman, J., Wilens, T., Faraone, S., Prince, J., Gerard, K., Doyle, R., Parekh, A., Kagan, J., & Bearman, S. K.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Archives of General Psychiatry
Published
2001-08-01
Volume
58
Issue
8
Pages
775
ISSN
0003-990X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169861403
Cited by
250
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R29MH57511, R29MH057511)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
adult ADHD, Adderall, ADHD medication, treatment efficacy, tolerability, psychiatric comorbidity, ADHD Rating Scale
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Amphetamines, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Mental Disorders, Double-Blind Method, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review