Dopamine Antagonists and the Development of Breast Cancer
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although animal studies have raised the possibility that prolactin-elevating dopamine antagonists used to treat psychotic disorders may initiate and promote breast cancers, epidemiologic studies in humans have been limited and inconsistent. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 52 819 women exposed and 55 289 not exposed to dopamine antagonists between January 1, 1989, and June 30, 1995. All participants were 20 years or older, initially free of breast cancer, and enrolled in the Medicaid or the Pharmaceutical Assistance to the Aged and Disabled programs of New Jersey. Incident breast cancer cases were identified through the New Jersey Cancer Registry and definitive breast cancer surgeries. Adjusted hazard ratios of breast cancer were calculated from multivariable proportional hazards models. RESULTS: Use of antipsychotic dopamine antagonists was associated with a 16% increase in the risk of breast cancer (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.26), with a dose-response relationship between larger cumulative dosages and greater risk. The increased risk was also seen in women who used prolactin-elevating antiemetic dopamine antagonists despite having different breast cancer risk profiles than antipsychotic dopamine antagonist users. Dopamine antagonist use was not associated with risk of colon cancer, a control condition not related to elevated prolactin levels. The increased risk of breast cancer among dopamine antagonist users was not explained by increased surveillance or protopathic bias. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic dopamine antagonist use may confer a small but significant risk of breast cancer. In light of the small hazards and the possibility of residual confounding, these findings should lead to follow-up investigations but not to changes in treatment strategies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of studies investigating the risk of breast cancer in patients treated with conventional antipsychotics did not uncover an increased risk of breast cancer, with an exception being the cohort study by Wang et al.
“The majority of the studies in which the risk of breast cancer has been investigated in patients treated with conventional AP (465-468) did not uncover an increased risk of breast cancer, an exception being the cohort study by Wang et al (469).”
From Physical illness in patients with severe mental disorders. I. Prevalence, impact of medications and disparities in health care (2011) · cites this paper as [469]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 196
- Authors
- Wang, P. S., Walker, A. M., Tsuang, M. T., Orav, E. J., Glynn, R. J., Levin, R., & Avorn, J.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Wang, Philip S.
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2002-12-01
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1147
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985101172
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 4.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5k01mh001651-04, 1r03ag018395-01)
- National Institute on Aging (R03-AG18395)
- National Institute of Mental Health (K01 MH01651)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response
- Keywords
- dopamine antagonists, antipsychotic drugs, breast cancer risk, prolactin, dose-response relationship, colon cancer, women, Medicaid beneficiaries
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Breast Neoplasms, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, New Jersey, Prolactin, Psychotic Disorders, Retrospective Studies, Risk, Antipsychotic Agents, Cohort Studies, Proportional Hazards Models, Dopamine Antagonists
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review