Impairments in Perceptual Competency and Maintenance on a Visual Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in First-Episode Schizophrenia
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Deficits in working memory (WM) have been reported in patients with schizophrenia, but WM is a complex construct dependent on several subprocesses, including input representation (perceptual competency) and holding stimuli on-line (maintenance). A visual delayed match-to-sample task (DMST) was developed to isolate perceptual competency from maintenance during delays. It was hypothesized that patients in the first episode of schizophrenia would exhibit dissociable deficits in both WM domains. METHODS: Performance on the DMST was assessed in 57 patients in the first episode of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 22 healthy comparison subjects. In phase 1 of the DMST, a complex visual stimulus (target) was followed immediately by a forced choice between 2 test stimuli, and item difficulty (differences between the test stimuli) was titrated until each subject achieved a consistent accuracy (80%-90%) in this no-delay condition. In phase 2, a delay of 4 or 8 seconds with a mask of randomly illuminated pixels was introduced between target and test stimuli; test stimuli were fixed in difficulty level based on phase 1 titration. Main outcome measures were mean item difficulty attained in the no-delay condition and mean accuracy in matching after delay. RESULTS: Compared with controls, patients attained a lower level of difficulty in the no-delay condition (P =.001) and significantly lower accuracy with delay (P =.002). CONCLUSIONS: Deficits in both domains of WM suggest abnormality in the posterior and prefrontal cortexes. These deficits can be observed in a task involving complex visual pattern stimuli using only a brief delay and are present even in unmedicated patients in the first episode of illness.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 56 · Cited by 89
- Authors
- Lencz, T., Bilder, R. M., Turkel, E., Goldman, R. S., Robinson, D., Kane, J. M., & Lieberman, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Northwell Health (US)
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2003-03-01
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 238
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1965121446
- Cited by
- 89
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p50mh041960-10, 5r01mh041646-07)
- National Institute of Mental Health (P50 MH-41960, R01 MH41646, K02 MH-00537, K02MH000537)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Keywords
- first-episode schizophrenia, working memory, maintenance, schizoaffective disorder, item difficulty, lagged effects, unmedicated patients
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Cognition Disorders, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Humans, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Reaction Time, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Antipsychotic Agents, Prefrontal Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review