Application of a Latent Class Analysis to Empirically Define EatingDisorder Phenotypes
Abstract
CONTEXT: Diagnostic criteria for eating disorders influence how we recognize, research, and treat eating disorders, and empirically valid phenotypes are required for revealing their genetic bases. OBJECTIVE: To empirically define eating disorder phenotypes. DESIGN: Data regarding eating disorder symptoms and features from 1179 individuals with clinically significant eating disorders were submitted to a latent class analysis. The resulting latent classes were compared on non-eating disorder variables in a series of validation analyses. SETTING: Multinational, collaborative study with cases ascertained through diverse clinical settings (inpatient, outpatient, and community). PARTICIPANTS: Members of affected relative pairs recruited for participation in genetic studies of eating disorders in which probands met DSM-IV-TR criteria for anorexia nervosa (AN) or bulimia nervosa and had at least 1 biological relative with a clinically significant eating disorder. Main Outcome Measure Number and clinical characterization of latent classes. RESULTS: A 4-class solution provided the best fit. Latent class 1 (LC1) resembled restricting AN; LC2, AN and bulimia nervosa with the use of multiple methods of purging; LC3, restricting AN without obsessive-compulsive features; and LC4, bulimia nervosa with self-induced vomiting as the sole form of purging. Biological relatives were significantly likely to belong to the same latent class. Across validation analyses, LC2 demonstrated the highest levels of psychological disturbance, and LC3 demonstrated the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of obsessive-compulsive features differentiates among individuals with restricting AN. Similarly, the combination of low weight and multiple methods of purging distinguishes among individuals with binge eating and purging behaviors. These results support some of the distinctions drawn within the DSM-IV-TR among eating disorder subtypes, while introducing new features to define phenotypes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The negative association between vomiting and recovery may be related to higher levels of psychological disturbance in individuals with anorexia nervosa and purging.
“Why vomiting is a negative prognostic factor is unclear, but may be related to the higher levels of psychological disturbance seen in individuals with AN and purging.”
From Factors associated with recovery from anorexia nervosa (2013) · cites this paper as Keel et al., 2004
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 50 · Cited by 181
- Authors
- Keel, P. K., Fichter, M., Quadflieg, N., Bulik, C. M., Baxter, M. G., Thornton, L., Halmi, K. A., Kaplan, A. S., Strober, M., Woodside, D. B., Crow, S. J., Mitchell, J. E., Rotondo, A., Mauri, M., Cassano, G., Treasure, J., Goldman, D., Berrettini, W. H., & Kaye, W. H.
- Affiliations
- University of Iowa (US)
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- University of Pittsburgh (US)
- Cornell University (US)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Neuropsychiatric Research Institute (US)
- University of Pisa (IT)
- King's College London (GB)
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Archives of General Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2004-02-01
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 192
- ISSN
- 0003-990X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2049155785
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 50
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 15.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of General Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Pennsylvania
- Harvard University
- University of Minnesota
- University of Pittsburgh
- Louis and Harold Price Foundation
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Università di Pisa
- National Institutes of Health (IA 52242)
- University of California, Los Angeles
- Medical Center, University of Pittsburgh
- Department of Psychology, Harvard University
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH63758, R01‐MH61836, R01MH061836, R01MH063758)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Keywords
- eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, self-induced vomiting, obsessive-compulsive traits, restrictive anorexia nervosa, eating disorder subtypes, genetic epidemiology, affected relative pairs, latent class structure
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Body Weight, Diagnosis, Differential, Feeding Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Phenotype, Sensitivity and Specificity, Models, Statistical, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review